Early vs. late definitive fixation of pelvic ring fractures in resuscitated polytraumatized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this systematic review is to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between early (EDF) and late definitive fixation (LDF) in polytraumatized patients with pelvic ring fractures (PRF). In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search using Boolean operators was performed in June 2022 from the following databases: Embase, Medline and Cochrane Library. Studies comparing EDF and LDF for PRF in polytrauma patients defined as ISS > 15 were included. All included cohorts performed definitive fixation after haemodynamic stabilisation or adequate response to resuscitation. Random effects meta-analyses of pooled raw data were employed using the Mantel-Haenszel and Inverse -variance methods. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Out of 869 studies screened, 10 were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 2918 patients. All included studies were retrospective; no randomized trials were identified. The most common time point used by 7 studies to define EDF was within 24 h of hospital admission and LDF (> 24 h). The most common reasons for LDF were surgeon’s choice, availability of pelvic surgeon and transfer from other hospitals. Our meta-analysis revealed that EDF was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay (WMD=-3.52 days; 95% CI: [-5.43 to -1.62], p < 0.0003) and lower incidence of ARDS (RR = 0.50; 95% CI: [0.26 to 0.96], p = 0.04). No significant association was found in mortality, length of ICU stay, multi-organ failure, sepsis and surgical site infection between EDF and LDF. These findings suggest that early definitive fixation may be a safe and viable option with no increased risk of complications and mortality. However, the adequacy of resuscitation and the estimate of physiologic reserve should be balanced with the risks of operative fixation in all patients. Further prospective validation studies are warranted to test the predictive ability of the various proposed trauma care models and stratify patients for EDF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-06152-9
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early vs. late definitive fixation of pelvic ring fractures in resuscitated polytraumatized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Andrew G Marsh, Mohammed Araiz Imran, Krishna Oochit
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

Early vs. late definitive fixation of pelvic ring fractures in resuscitated polytraumatized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Andrew G Marsh, Mohammed Araiz Imran, Krishna Oochit
article en

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review is to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between early (EDF) and late definitive fixation (LDF) in polytraumatized patients with pelvic ring fractures (PRF). In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search using Boolean operators was performed in June 2022 from the following databases: Embase, Medline and Cochrane Library. Studies comparing EDF and LDF for PRF in polytrauma patients defined as ISS > 15 were included. All included cohorts performed definitive fixation after haemodynamic stabilisation or adequate response to resuscitation. Random effects meta-analyses of pooled raw data were employed using the Mantel-Haenszel and Inverse -variance methods. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Out of 869 studies screened, 10 were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 2918 patients. All included studies were retrospective; no randomized trials were identified. The most common time point used by 7 studies to define EDF was within 24 h of hospital admission and LDF (> 24 h). The most common reasons for LDF were surgeon’s choice, availability of pelvic surgeon and transfer from other hospitals. Our meta-analysis revealed that EDF was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay (WMD=-3.52 days; 95% CI: [-5.43 to -1.62], p < 0.0003) and lower incidence of ARDS (RR = 0.50; 95% CI: [0.26 to 0.96], p = 0.04). No significant association was found in mortality, length of ICU stay, multi-organ failure, sepsis and surgical site infection between EDF and LDF. These findings suggest that early definitive fixation may be a safe and viable option with no increased risk of complications and mortality. However, the adequacy of resuscitation and the estimate of physiologic reserve should be balanced with the risks of operative fixation in all patients. Further prospective validation studies are warranted to test the predictive ability of the various proposed trauma care models and stratify patients for EDF.

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryVol. 146(1)
The Royal Free Hospital (GB), Royal Alexandra Hospital (GB), Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (GB), University College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.