Comparative Analysis of Rainfall-Based and Discharge-Based Early Warning Methods for Flash Floods

Against the backdrop of increasingly evident climate change and frequent extreme weather events, flash floods have emerged as a major challenge for flood disaster prevention and mitigation in China. Flash flood early warning systems are crucial means to address this challenge, primarily comprising rainfall-based warnings (RW) and discharge-based warnings (DW). To support precise flash flood warnings, this study compares the effectiveness of RW and DW and summarizes their applicable scenarios through both case study analysis and model simulations. The results demonstrate that DW outperforms RW under the following scenarios: ① During persistent moderate-intensity rainfall events when antecedent soil moisture is moderate to high, RW is prone to missed or delayed warnings. ② When rainfall exhibits significant spatial heterogeneity, RW tends to produce false alarms. Conversely, RW outperforms DW in the following scenarios: ① For localized short-duration heavy rainfall events, DW is prone to missed or delayed warnings. ② In basins where numerous small- and medium-sized reservoirs exist upstream without operational data, DW is prone to false alarms. ③ When sparse or unevenly distributed rain gauges result in poor representativeness of areal rainfall, DW is prone to missed warnings. To enhance flash flood disaster management, future warning systems should integrate both RW and DW approaches to deliver more timely, reliable, and scientifically grounded warning information for local authorities.