Evolution of vocal control in echolocating bats

Echolocating bats display a large repertoire of behavioural plasticity, with vocal flexibility as a core constituent. The speed and accuracy of vocal adjustments executed by echolocating bats are unparalleled by other mammals, including humans. However, the evolutionary pressures behind the extraordinary vocal flexibility of echolocating bats remains elusive. Here we conducted a synthetic review to evaluate critically the probable drivers for all forms of vocal flexibility in echolocating bats. We show that many forms of bat echolocation flexibility, accounting for approximately 60% of vocal adjustment behaviours, function to mitigate acoustic interference, and thus can be attributed to auditory masking. Importantly, half of these anti-interference strategies are related to reafferent masking that is specific to active-sensing animals. We propose that auditory masking mitigation represents a strong selection pressure for the remarkable repertoire of vocal flexibility in echolocating bats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/brv.70122
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution of vocal control in echolocating bats

Cynthia F. Moss, Jinhong Luo, Shuying Chen, Yossi Yovel
1 citations
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
3.03
article

Evolution of vocal control in echolocating bats

Cynthia F. Moss, Jinhong Luo, Shuying Chen, Yossi Yovel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Echolocating bats display a large repertoire of behavioural plasticity, with vocal flexibility as a core constituent. The speed and accuracy of vocal adjustments executed by echolocating bats are unparalleled by other mammals, including humans. However, the evolutionary pressures behind the extraordinary vocal flexibility of echolocating bats remains elusive. Here we conducted a synthetic review to evaluate critically the probable drivers for all forms of vocal flexibility in echolocating bats. We show that many forms of bat echolocation flexibility, accounting for approximately 60% of vocal adjustment behaviours, function to mitigate acoustic interference, and thus can be attributed to auditory masking. Importantly, half of these anti-interference strategies are related to reafferent masking that is specific to active-sensing animals. We propose that auditory masking mitigation represents a strong selection pressure for the remarkable repertoire of vocal flexibility in echolocating bats.

Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Johns Hopkins University (US), Tel Aviv University (IL), Central China Normal University (CN)
National Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Central China Normal University, National Institutes of Health, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evolution of vocal control in echolocating bats — Cynthia F. Moss, Jinhong Luo, et al. · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS