How the education experiences of youth in care are explored in the qualitative literature; a scoping review

This scoping review aimed to explore the qualitative research on the educational experiences of youth in care. The initial search yielded 9913 sources. Following multiple exclusion steps, 18 sources remained, half of which were unpublished theses with eight journal articles and one report. There were 397 participants included in this review, most of whom were young women from the same female-only public charter school for court-involved youth in the United States. Participant characteristics were inconsistently reported, particularly race/ethnicity which was unknown for 45% of participants. One-off interviews and focus groups were the predominant data collection methods used in the qualitative research. None of the 18 studies utilised participatory or co-design methods. The poor demographic reporting and traditional research methods make it difficult to determine whose experiences the research is capturing, and produce doubt that the experiences of those most impacted by the care system are being understood in meaningful ways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Child Welfare
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25161032251413052
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How the education experiences of youth in care are explored in the qualitative literature; a scoping review

Clare McCann, Ebonee Hodder, Pat Bullen, Katrina J. Phillips
Developmental Child Welfare
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

How the education experiences of youth in care are explored in the qualitative literature; a scoping review

Clare McCann, Ebonee Hodder, Pat Bullen, Katrina J. Phillips
article en

Abstract

This scoping review aimed to explore the qualitative research on the educational experiences of youth in care. The initial search yielded 9913 sources. Following multiple exclusion steps, 18 sources remained, half of which were unpublished theses with eight journal articles and one report. There were 397 participants included in this review, most of whom were young women from the same female-only public charter school for court-involved youth in the United States. Participant characteristics were inconsistently reported, particularly race/ethnicity which was unknown for 45% of participants. One-off interviews and focus groups were the predominant data collection methods used in the qualitative research. None of the 18 studies utilised participatory or co-design methods. The poor demographic reporting and traditional research methods make it difficult to determine whose experiences the research is capturing, and produce doubt that the experiences of those most impacted by the care system are being understood in meaningful ways.

Developmental Child WelfareVol. 8(1)
University of Auckland (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.