Does Emotional Working Memory Training Ameliorate Anxiety and Depression? A Meta-Analytic Review

Depression and anxiety disorders are associated with deficits in several cognitive domains. This meta-analytic review assessed the effects of emotional working memory training (eWMT) on depression and anxiety and their related emotional and cognitive domains. Eligible studies were assessed for changes in depression, anxiety, emotion and cognition after eWMT. Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's guidelines, and random-effects models aggregated the results of individual studies. Of 1314 studies identified, 16 were included (883 participants; mean age range, 14.35-68.79 years; 70.44% female). Nine studies were high quality, seven were moderate quality, and none were low quality. There was relatively high heterogeneity across studies and study populations. The eWMT significantly reduced depression (standardized mean difference [SMD], -2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.68 to -0.39; <i>p</i> = 0.02) and anxiety (SMD, -0.44; 95% CI = -0.23 to -0.17; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and significantly enhanced reappraisal (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.66; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and working memory capacity (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.53; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with no significant effect on rumination. Training frequency, training environment, and type of control group differentially affected working memory capacity. Our results demonstrated that eWMT alleviated depression and anxiety, but not rumination, and improved the related factors of reappraisal and working memory. Given the limited number of studies and substantial heterogeneity in the data, further research is needed to support these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010030
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Emotional Working Memory Training Ameliorate Anxiety and Depression? A Meta-Analytic Review

Yirang Wang, Hong Mou, Ting Zhou, Jiehang Ou
Brain Sciences
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

Does Emotional Working Memory Training Ameliorate Anxiety and Depression? A Meta-Analytic Review

Yirang Wang, Hong Mou, Ting Zhou, Jiehang Ou
article en

Abstract

Depression and anxiety disorders are associated with deficits in several cognitive domains. This meta-analytic review assessed the effects of emotional working memory training (eWMT) on depression and anxiety and their related emotional and cognitive domains. Eligible studies were assessed for changes in depression, anxiety, emotion and cognition after eWMT. Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's guidelines, and random-effects models aggregated the results of individual studies. Of 1314 studies identified, 16 were included (883 participants; mean age range, 14.35-68.79 years; 70.44% female). Nine studies were high quality, seven were moderate quality, and none were low quality. There was relatively high heterogeneity across studies and study populations. The eWMT significantly reduced depression (standardized mean difference [SMD], -2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.68 to -0.39; <i>p</i> = 0.02) and anxiety (SMD, -0.44; 95% CI = -0.23 to -0.17; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and significantly enhanced reappraisal (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.66; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and working memory capacity (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.53; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with no significant effect on rumination. Training frequency, training environment, and type of control group differentially affected working memory capacity. Our results demonstrated that eWMT alleviated depression and anxiety, but not rumination, and improved the related factors of reappraisal and working memory. Given the limited number of studies and substantial heterogeneity in the data, further research is needed to support these results.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(1)
Shanghai University of Sport (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.