Hybrid Aortic Arch Repair for Patients Older Than 60 Years in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection

The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of total arch replacement (TAR) combined with stented elephant trunk (SET) implantation and hybrid aortic arch repair (HAAR) for type A acute aortic dissection (TA-AAD) in patients older than 60 years.We studied records of patients with TA-AAD older than 60 years in our hospital between January 2016 and December 2018. About 68 patients underwent TAR combined with SET implantation (SET group), and 56 patients underwent HAAR (hybrid group). Outcomes included operative data, postoperative data, and 2 years of follow-up data.Comparing with the SET group, the hybrid group experienced shorter time on surgery duration (<i>p</i> < 0.001), cardiopulmonary bypass (<i>p</i> < 0.001), aortic cross-clamp (<i>p</i> < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (<i>p</i> < 0.001), ICU stay (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and hospital length of stay (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The hybrid group showed a lower rate of pulmonary infection and renal failure (<i>p</i> = 0.023; <i>p</i> = 0.022, respectively). Blood product use was less in the hybrid group (<i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.001). The hybrid group had a trend toward reducing the 30-day mortality rate, stroke, and transient mental dysfunction. The hybrid group had a trend toward improving the 2-year survival rate and reintervention-free rate, but the results did not reach a significant level.Hybrid procedure could be safely performed in patients older than 60 years with TA-AAD. This procedure may be associated with encouraging surgical results and promising outcomes in the early and mid-term.