Evaluating the ecological effectiveness of landscape-level collaborative conservation: A case study targeting wild bees

Collaborative multi-actor conservation has been heralded as an effective way to address historical biodiversity loss because it makes landscape-level multi-habitat management strategies possible. However, its ecological effectiveness is not well understood. We examine a multi-actor approach in which 11 organisations collaborated to enhance wild bees in a 30 km 2 landscape in the south of the Netherlands. Using a novel study design for landscape-level conservation initiatives, we compared six-year trends in wild bee abundance and species richness and flower cover and species richness in 47 sites with bee-friendly management aimed at increasing the spatio-temporal availability of flowers in five habitats (extensive pastures, road verges, field margins, hedgerows, water retention sites) with trends in similar numbers of conventionally managed controls inside and outside the landscape. Overall, wild bee abundance and species richness increased in sites with bee-friendly management relative to controls, though effectiveness varied by habitat. Across all sites, bee-friendly management resulted in significantly more positive trends in flower cover than in control sites, yet trends in managed sites were stable rather than increasing and flower cover declined by approximately 46 % in control sites. The implementation success of bee-friendly management varied by habitat type and year, and was a key factor underlying the ecological effectiveness of said management. Our results suggest that coordinated collaborative approaches across complementary habitats can produce conservation benefits, but that success depends on effective communication with and consistent participation of actors, guidance by a coordinator, and continuous monitoring of management implementation and ecological outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111682
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the ecological effectiveness of landscape-level collaborative conservation: A case study targeting wild bees

Joan Díaz‐Calafat, Mats de Boer, Janneke Scheeres, Jeroen Scheper et al.
Biological Conservation
Plant and animal studies
article

Evaluating the ecological effectiveness of landscape-level collaborative conservation: A case study targeting wild bees

Joan Díaz‐Calafat, Mats de Boer, Janneke Scheeres, Jeroen Scheper, David Kingma, Maarten Frank van der Schee, Klara Leander Oh, David Kleijn, Anne Hage, Ivo Raemakers, Thirza M. de Kruijff, Wouter G. Oe, Frank Rooijakkers, Hanna Keurhorst-van Krimpen, Ruud van Kats
article en

Abstract

Collaborative multi-actor conservation has been heralded as an effective way to address historical biodiversity loss because it makes landscape-level multi-habitat management strategies possible. However, its ecological effectiveness is not well understood. We examine a multi-actor approach in which 11 organisations collaborated to enhance wild bees in a 30 km 2 landscape in the south of the Netherlands. Using a novel study design for landscape-level conservation initiatives, we compared six-year trends in wild bee abundance and species richness and flower cover and species richness in 47 sites with bee-friendly management aimed at increasing the spatio-temporal availability of flowers in five habitats (extensive pastures, road verges, field margins, hedgerows, water retention sites) with trends in similar numbers of conventionally managed controls inside and outside the landscape. Overall, wild bee abundance and species richness increased in sites with bee-friendly management relative to controls, though effectiveness varied by habitat. Across all sites, bee-friendly management resulted in significantly more positive trends in flower cover than in control sites, yet trends in managed sites were stable rather than increasing and flower cover declined by approximately 46 % in control sites. The implementation success of bee-friendly management varied by habitat type and year, and was a key factor underlying the ecological effectiveness of said management. Our results suggest that coordinated collaborative approaches across complementary habitats can produce conservation benefits, but that success depends on effective communication with and consistent participation of actors, guidance by a coordinator, and continuous monitoring of management implementation and ecological outcomes.

Biological ConservationVol. 314
Centrum voor Landbouw en Milieu (NL), Creative Commons (US), Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.