The ethics of invisible stakeholders: addressing the needs of marginalized voices in social innovation

Purpose This study aims to explore the ethical challenges of marginalizing invisible stakeholders (marginalized groups, nonhumans and future generations) in social innovation and participatory governance, aiming to understand how stakeholder inclusion and ethical frameworks impact the engagement process and ethical outcomes. Design/methodology/approach Using a positivist approach, this study analyzed data from the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) top 100 A-share listed companies to examine the relationships among stakeholder inclusion, ethical frameworks and ethical outcomes in governance. Findings Stakeholder inclusion positively impacted the engagement process, with ethical outcomes varying based on the engagement approach. This study found that the stakeholder engagement process mediated the relationship between inclusion, ethical frameworks and outcomes, highlighting the need for inclusive and ethical governance. Research limitations/implications This study’s focus on SSE top A-share listed companies in China limits generalizability. Its positivist methodology may not capture the full complexity of stakeholder engagement in other sectors or regions. Practical implications The findings suggest that businesses and governments should adopt ethical frameworks and inclusive engagement processes to improve governance outcomes, ensuring fairness and sustainability in decision-making. Social implications This study advocates for the inclusion of marginalized groups and future generations in governance, promoting more just, sustainable and equitable decision-making practices. Originality/value This research contributes to the understanding of ethical governance by emphasizing the need for inclusive stakeholder engagement and intergenerational consideration in decision-making. It provides a novel perspective on how ethical frameworks and stakeholder inclusion affect governance practices, promoting sustainability and equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social enterprise journal
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-07-2025-0166
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ethics of invisible stakeholders: addressing the needs of marginalized voices in social innovation

Mehreen Arshad, Abid Hussain, Muhammad Ehsan, Umar Akbar
Social enterprise journal
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

The ethics of invisible stakeholders: addressing the needs of marginalized voices in social innovation

Mehreen Arshad, Abid Hussain, Muhammad Ehsan, Umar Akbar
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the ethical challenges of marginalizing invisible stakeholders (marginalized groups, nonhumans and future generations) in social innovation and participatory governance, aiming to understand how stakeholder inclusion and ethical frameworks impact the engagement process and ethical outcomes. Design/methodology/approach Using a positivist approach, this study analyzed data from the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) top 100 A-share listed companies to examine the relationships among stakeholder inclusion, ethical frameworks and ethical outcomes in governance. Findings Stakeholder inclusion positively impacted the engagement process, with ethical outcomes varying based on the engagement approach. This study found that the stakeholder engagement process mediated the relationship between inclusion, ethical frameworks and outcomes, highlighting the need for inclusive and ethical governance. Research limitations/implications This study’s focus on SSE top A-share listed companies in China limits generalizability. Its positivist methodology may not capture the full complexity of stakeholder engagement in other sectors or regions. Practical implications The findings suggest that businesses and governments should adopt ethical frameworks and inclusive engagement processes to improve governance outcomes, ensuring fairness and sustainability in decision-making. Social implications This study advocates for the inclusion of marginalized groups and future generations in governance, promoting more just, sustainable and equitable decision-making practices. Originality/value This research contributes to the understanding of ethical governance by emphasizing the need for inclusive stakeholder engagement and intergenerational consideration in decision-making. It provides a novel perspective on how ethical frameworks and stakeholder inclusion affect governance practices, promoting sustainability and equity.

Social enterprise journalVol. 22(2)
University of Sargodha (PK), Gomal University (PK), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.