Reimagining Self-Determination in Research, Education, and Disability Services and Supports

After decades of work to advance policy, research, and practice focused on self-determination for people with disabilities, the importance of self-determination is widely acknowledged in education and disability service systems. While the benefits of the growing recognition of the importance of self-determination have been many, there have also been some unintended consequences. One such consequence has been the de-centering of disabled leadership and subsequent confusion about whether the term self-determination refers to an outcome, a program, an intervention, a value, a right, or a movement. In this article, written by an inclusive team of authors, we invite readers to join us in reimagining self-determination, considering ways to further contextualize the concept of self-determination within the practical reality of its application. We offer a discussion of the necessity of continuing to center lived disability expertise and implications for policy, research, and practice in this reimagined approach to self-determination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Disability Policy Studies
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073251404904
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining Self-Determination in Research, Education, and Disability Services and Supports

Charles B. Walters, Karrie A. Shogren, Rebecca B. Smith Hill, Everett Deibler et al.
Journal of Disability Policy Studies
Disability Education and Employment
article

Reimagining Self-Determination in Research, Education, and Disability Services and Supports

Charles B. Walters, Karrie A. Shogren, Rebecca B. Smith Hill, Everett Deibler, Josie Badger, Amanda M. Waldron, Nour Mansour, Cadence J. Russell
article en

Abstract

After decades of work to advance policy, research, and practice focused on self-determination for people with disabilities, the importance of self-determination is widely acknowledged in education and disability service systems. While the benefits of the growing recognition of the importance of self-determination have been many, there have also been some unintended consequences. One such consequence has been the de-centering of disabled leadership and subsequent confusion about whether the term self-determination refers to an outcome, a program, an intervention, a value, a right, or a movement. In this article, written by an inclusive team of authors, we invite readers to join us in reimagining self-determination, considering ways to further contextualize the concept of self-determination within the practical reality of its application. We offer a discussion of the necessity of continuing to center lived disability expertise and implications for policy, research, and practice in this reimagined approach to self-determination.

Journal of Disability Policy Studies
University of Kansas (US), University of South Carolina (US), Youth Development (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reimagining Self-Determination in Research, Education, and Disability Services and Supports — Charles B. Walters, Karrie A. Shogren, et al. · Journal of Disability Policy Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS