DSM‐5 Functional Framework: Structure and Psychopathological Correlates of the DSM‐5 Levels of Functioning Questionnaire–Short Form

Interest in the Level of Personality Functioning (LPF), defined by Criterion A of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD), is growing. LPF includes self-functioning (identity, self-direction) and interpersonal functioning (empathy, intimacy). While LPF is crucial for understanding personality dysfunction, its ability to distinguish personality disorders from other conditions remains debated. The DSM-5 Levels of Functioning Questionnaire-Short Form (DLOPFQ-SF) is a promising LPF measure, but further research in diverse populations is needed. This study examined the internal structure and psychopathological correlates of the DLOPFQ-SF in an Italian nonclinical sample. Specifically, it assessed the tool's factor structure and relations with the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) and positive adjustment. A sample of 1183 Italian participants (46.2% female, mean age = 31.3 ± 14.8) completed the DLOPFQ-SF and other self-report measures. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed a three-factor structure comprising Identity, Empathy, and Intimacy. Structural equation modeling (SEM) explored links between the three DLOPFQ-SF dimensions, HiTOP dimensions (internalizing, externalizing-antisocial, antagonism, detachment, psychoticism), and positive adjustment. In general, SEM analyses showed that higher LPF scores were associated with increased psychopathology and reduced well-being. The three subscales demonstrated specific links to distinct psychopathological outcomes, thereby supporting the construct validity of the DLOPFQ-SF. Despite the removal of the Self-Direction scale, the instrument proved useful in capturing key aspects of LPF across self and interpersonal domains, reinforcing its relevance within a dimensional model of psychopathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Mental Health
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.70056
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DSM‐5 Functional Framework: Structure and Psychopathological Correlates of the DSM‐5 Levels of Functioning Questionnaire–Short Form

Corrado Caudek, Claudio Sica, Ilaria Colpizzi, Gioia Bottesi
Personality and Mental Health
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

DSM‐5 Functional Framework: Structure and Psychopathological Correlates of the DSM‐5 Levels of Functioning Questionnaire–Short Form

Corrado Caudek, Claudio Sica, Ilaria Colpizzi, Gioia Bottesi
article en

Abstract

Interest in the Level of Personality Functioning (LPF), defined by Criterion A of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD), is growing. LPF includes self-functioning (identity, self-direction) and interpersonal functioning (empathy, intimacy). While LPF is crucial for understanding personality dysfunction, its ability to distinguish personality disorders from other conditions remains debated. The DSM-5 Levels of Functioning Questionnaire-Short Form (DLOPFQ-SF) is a promising LPF measure, but further research in diverse populations is needed. This study examined the internal structure and psychopathological correlates of the DLOPFQ-SF in an Italian nonclinical sample. Specifically, it assessed the tool's factor structure and relations with the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) and positive adjustment. A sample of 1183 Italian participants (46.2% female, mean age = 31.3 ± 14.8) completed the DLOPFQ-SF and other self-report measures. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed a three-factor structure comprising Identity, Empathy, and Intimacy. Structural equation modeling (SEM) explored links between the three DLOPFQ-SF dimensions, HiTOP dimensions (internalizing, externalizing-antisocial, antagonism, detachment, psychoticism), and positive adjustment. In general, SEM analyses showed that higher LPF scores were associated with increased psychopathology and reduced well-being. The three subscales demonstrated specific links to distinct psychopathological outcomes, thereby supporting the construct validity of the DLOPFQ-SF. Despite the removal of the Self-Direction scale, the instrument proved useful in capturing key aspects of LPF across self and interpersonal domains, reinforcing its relevance within a dimensional model of psychopathology.

Personality and Mental HealthVol. 20(1)
University of Padua (IT), University of Trieste (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.