The risk prediction models for deep venous thrombosis in perioperative patients with lower limb fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The quality of model development and its applicability are still unknown, even though numerous studies have developed or validated predictive models to estimate the risk of perioperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in lower limb fractures. The aim of the study was to systematically assess the DVT risk prediction model in lower limb fracture patients in the perioperative phase. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were assessed regarding studies on risk prediction models for perioperative DVT in limb fractures. The search period spanned from the database establishment to December 20, 2024. Two investigators independently screened the articles and extracted the data, and the quality of the included articles was evaluated using the PROBAST assessment tool. A total of 21 studies describing 25 predictive models were included, and the acquired data indicated that the incidence of DVT ranged from 1.2% to 72.5% in the perioperative period of lower limb fractures. The most commonly used predictors were D-dimer, age, time from injury to admission, and time from injury to surgery. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for all models ranged from 0.676 to 0.979. While twenty-three models demonstrated good predictive performance, many exhibited biases, often stemming from unreported methods for handling missing data, some models lacked external validation. The combined AUC value for the training models was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.78–0.87), suggesting a moderate level of discrimination. The existing model exhibits good overall prediction performance and a low applicability risk, however the bias risk is high. To enhance the robustness of these findings, further research should encompass prospective studies, external validation of the current model, and refinement of the statistical analysis aspects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09457-3
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The risk prediction models for deep venous thrombosis in perioperative patients with lower limb fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Huizhuo Deng, Jie He, Xiaoyan Li, Ruixin He
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

The risk prediction models for deep venous thrombosis in perioperative patients with lower limb fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Huizhuo Deng, Jie He, Xiaoyan Li, Ruixin He
article en

Abstract

The quality of model development and its applicability are still unknown, even though numerous studies have developed or validated predictive models to estimate the risk of perioperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in lower limb fractures. The aim of the study was to systematically assess the DVT risk prediction model in lower limb fracture patients in the perioperative phase. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were assessed regarding studies on risk prediction models for perioperative DVT in limb fractures. The search period spanned from the database establishment to December 20, 2024. Two investigators independently screened the articles and extracted the data, and the quality of the included articles was evaluated using the PROBAST assessment tool. A total of 21 studies describing 25 predictive models were included, and the acquired data indicated that the incidence of DVT ranged from 1.2% to 72.5% in the perioperative period of lower limb fractures. The most commonly used predictors were D-dimer, age, time from injury to admission, and time from injury to surgery. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for all models ranged from 0.676 to 0.979. While twenty-three models demonstrated good predictive performance, many exhibited biases, often stemming from unreported methods for handling missing data, some models lacked external validation. The combined AUC value for the training models was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.78–0.87), suggesting a moderate level of discrimination. The existing model exhibits good overall prediction performance and a low applicability risk, however the bias risk is high. To enhance the robustness of these findings, further research should encompass prospective studies, external validation of the current model, and refinement of the statistical analysis aspects.

BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersVol. 27(1)
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Chengdu Medical College (CN), Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.