Influence of beef retail cuts on the quality, sensory, and color beef floss: A comparison between silverside and chuck

This study evaluates the influence of different beef retail cuts on the chemical composition, color attributes, and sensory acceptability of traditional beef floss. The differences in this research treatment were the location of retail cut P1 (silverside) and P2 (Chuck), each treatment replicated in five batches, each batch consisting of 3 replicates. The sensory attributes observed including color, texture, and overall acceptability, were significant, but not significant on aroma and aftertaste. The differences in retail cuts influence the chemical composition, especially in moisture, fat, and protein. There were also contributions on instrumental color measurements were higher lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*) values on P2 compared to P1, suggesting enhanced visual appeal. These findings suggest that chuck cut (P2) is more favorable for producing high-quality, visually appealing, and consumer-accepted beef floss.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202520704003/pdf
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of beef retail cuts on the quality, sensory, and color beef floss: A comparison between silverside and chuck

Winny Swastike, Bayu Setya Hertanto, Farouq Heidar Barido, Adi Magna Patriadi Nuhriawangsa
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Influence of beef retail cuts on the quality, sensory, and color beef floss: A comparison between silverside and chuck

Winny Swastike, Bayu Setya Hertanto, Farouq Heidar Barido, Adi Magna Patriadi Nuhriawangsa
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the influence of different beef retail cuts on the chemical composition, color attributes, and sensory acceptability of traditional beef floss. The differences in this research treatment were the location of retail cut P1 (silverside) and P2 (Chuck), each treatment replicated in five batches, each batch consisting of 3 replicates. The sensory attributes observed including color, texture, and overall acceptability, were significant, but not significant on aroma and aftertaste. The differences in retail cuts influence the chemical composition, especially in moisture, fat, and protein. There were also contributions on instrumental color measurements were higher lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*) values on P2 compared to P1, suggesting enhanced visual appeal. These findings suggest that chuck cut (P2) is more favorable for producing high-quality, visually appealing, and consumer-accepted beef floss.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Influence of beef retail cuts on the quality, sensory, and color beef floss: A comparison between silverside and chuck — Winny Swastike, Bayu Setya Hertanto, et al. · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS