Ethnic minorities in online museum collections: skews and bias in digital material culture

Abstract As gateways into accessing the past, and catalogues of the cultures—and their biases—that we inherit, there are various research possibilities and limitations when considering library and museum online collections as sources of data. This study analyses different perspectives on how Jewish and Armenian ethnic minorities are represented by digital online collections of major historical museums. We document that the representation of concepts is skewed due to acquisition practices, augmented by the socio-technical infrastructures of the two museums under study. We show skews in the representation determined by major object groups (e.g. several thousand objects of the same type from a single archaeological expedition). Finally, we demonstrate that analysis of semi-structured data of museum catalogues presents major processing difficulties due to the multiple meanings of the same concept. We argue that the analysis of museum catalogues should include the knowledge of socio-technical contexts of data creation, such as metadata and lengthier structures, such as paradata or historical interpretation, which may add depth and meaning to subsequent analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf104
Primary Topic
Museums and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethnic minorities in online museum collections: skews and bias in digital material culture

Moshe Lavee, Yael Netzer, Inna Kizhner, Melissa Terras et al.
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Museums and Cultural Heritage
article

Ethnic minorities in online museum collections: skews and bias in digital material culture

Moshe Lavee, Yael Netzer, Inna Kizhner, Melissa Terras, Daniil Skorinkin
article en

Abstract

Abstract As gateways into accessing the past, and catalogues of the cultures—and their biases—that we inherit, there are various research possibilities and limitations when considering library and museum online collections as sources of data. This study analyses different perspectives on how Jewish and Armenian ethnic minorities are represented by digital online collections of major historical museums. We document that the representation of concepts is skewed due to acquisition practices, augmented by the socio-technical infrastructures of the two museums under study. We show skews in the representation determined by major object groups (e.g. several thousand objects of the same type from a single archaeological expedition). Finally, we demonstrate that analysis of semi-structured data of museum catalogues presents major processing difficulties due to the multiple meanings of the same concept. We argue that the analysis of museum catalogues should include the knowledge of socio-technical contexts of data creation, such as metadata and lengthier structures, such as paradata or historical interpretation, which may add depth and meaning to subsequent analysis.

Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
University of Potsdam (DE), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), University of Haifa (IL), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Museums and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethnic minorities in online museum collections: skews and bias in digital material culture — Moshe Lavee, Yael Netzer, et al. · Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS