“It Feels Wrong”: Understanding Reactions to Artificial Intelligence as a Decision‐Maker in Selection Through the Lens of Moral Foundations Theory

ABSTRACT The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) decision‐making in the workplace poses a moral issue beyond mere technology acceptance, considering the potential consequences of algorithmic management to individuals' professional well‐being. In view of its pluralistic approach to human morality, we adopt Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) as our theoretical lens through which to study reactions to AI‐led decision‐making in selection. Using a qualitative approach, we explore individuals' reactions to the idea of AI‐evaluated interviews, mapping these reactions onto moral foundations, identifying novel sub‐themes specific to the context of AI in selection. Using 33 interviews with working adults, we find that all six moral foundations ‐ care, fairness, authority, loyalty, sanctity, and liberty ‐ are evoked when discussing the implementation of AI in selection. We discuss how these moral foundations manifest themselves in this AI decision making context, and articulate theoretical and practical implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.70039
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It Feels Wrong”: Understanding Reactions to Artificial Intelligence as a Decision‐Maker in Selection Through the Lens of Moral Foundations Theory

Jbid Arsenyan, Agata Mirowska
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

“It Feels Wrong”: Understanding Reactions to Artificial Intelligence as a Decision‐Maker in Selection Through the Lens of Moral Foundations Theory

Jbid Arsenyan, Agata Mirowska
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) decision‐making in the workplace poses a moral issue beyond mere technology acceptance, considering the potential consequences of algorithmic management to individuals' professional well‐being. In view of its pluralistic approach to human morality, we adopt Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) as our theoretical lens through which to study reactions to AI‐led decision‐making in selection. Using a qualitative approach, we explore individuals' reactions to the idea of AI‐evaluated interviews, mapping these reactions onto moral foundations, identifying novel sub‐themes specific to the context of AI in selection. Using 33 interviews with working adults, we find that all six moral foundations ‐ care, fairness, authority, loyalty, sanctity, and liberty ‐ are evoked when discussing the implementation of AI in selection. We discuss how these moral foundations manifest themselves in this AI decision making context, and articulate theoretical and practical implications.

International Journal of Selection and AssessmentVol. 34(1)
NEOMA Business School (FR), École Supérieure de Commerce de Rennes (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.