Political allies in foreign war news framing: A four-country comparison of the 2022 Russia–Ukraine war news coverage

We examined news framing of the 2022 Russia–Ukraine war among four countries. Employing quantitative content analysis of ( n = 230) news stories, we find complex framing dynamics based on political allyship. NATO ally news outlets, The New York Times and Guardian exhibited strong pro-Ukrainian stance in their framing. China Daily , a communist-affiliated outlet, leaned more toward a pro-Russian perspective, with the Times of India mixed in its frames . US and UK news predominantly attributed responsibility for the war to Russia, casting Ukraine as the victim of Russian aggression. In contrast, while China Daily and The Times of India sympathized with Ukraine as the victim, they were less likely to blame Russia for the war. Overall, provocative narratives were occasionally found, with NYT , Guardian , and Times of India targeting Russia, while China Daily targeted NATO with provocative narratives, demonstrating divergent approaches in the framing of the war based on their political alliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Communication Gazette
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485251404806
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political allies in foreign war news framing: A four-country comparison of the 2022 Russia–Ukraine war news coverage

Shudipta Sharma, Michael Ofori, Louisa Ha
International Communication Gazette
Media Studies and Communication
article

Political allies in foreign war news framing: A four-country comparison of the 2022 Russia–Ukraine war news coverage

Shudipta Sharma, Michael Ofori, Louisa Ha
article en

Abstract

We examined news framing of the 2022 Russia–Ukraine war among four countries. Employing quantitative content analysis of ( n = 230) news stories, we find complex framing dynamics based on political allyship. NATO ally news outlets, The New York Times and Guardian exhibited strong pro-Ukrainian stance in their framing. China Daily , a communist-affiliated outlet, leaned more toward a pro-Russian perspective, with the Times of India mixed in its frames . US and UK news predominantly attributed responsibility for the war to Russia, casting Ukraine as the victim of Russian aggression. In contrast, while China Daily and The Times of India sympathized with Ukraine as the victim, they were less likely to blame Russia for the war. Overall, provocative narratives were occasionally found, with NYT , Guardian , and Times of India targeting Russia, while China Daily targeted NATO with provocative narratives, demonstrating divergent approaches in the framing of the war based on their political alliance.

International Communication Gazette
Bowling Green State University (US), University of Minnesota System (US), University of Chittagong (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Political allies in foreign war news framing: A four-country comparison of the 2022 Russia–Ukraine war news coverage — Shudipta Sharma, Michael Ofori, et al. · International Communication Gazette (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS