Comparing Measures of Information in Head-Related Transfer Functions

The NEMO initiative works towards agreeing on one set of head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) for use across various applications whenever incorporating individual(ized) HRTFs is not feasible.This initiative is grounded on the assumption that listeners benefit from adapting to a set of HRTFs that is different from their own.Naturally, one key step in this process is the selection of the particular set.We hypothesize that the available information in the set influences adaptation speed and/or post-adaptation localization performance and, therefore, is a potential factor in the selection.To test this hypothesis, it is essential to develop measures that quantify the information of an HRTF set.To this end, this contribution presents several potential measures of information content and compares them using multiple HRTF sets.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61782/fa.2025.0228
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Measures of Information in Head-Related Transfer Functions

Nils Meyer‐Kahlen, Pedro Lladó, Katharina Pollack
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Comparing Measures of Information in Head-Related Transfer Functions

Nils Meyer‐Kahlen, Pedro Lladó, Katharina Pollack
article en

Abstract

The NEMO initiative works towards agreeing on one set of head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) for use across various applications whenever incorporating individual(ized) HRTFs is not feasible.This initiative is grounded on the assumption that listeners benefit from adapting to a set of HRTFs that is different from their own.Naturally, one key step in this process is the selection of the particular set.We hypothesize that the available information in the set influences adaptation speed and/or post-adaptation localization performance and, therefore, is a potential factor in the selection.To test this hypothesis, it is essential to develop measures that quantify the information of an HRTF set.To this end, this contribution presents several potential measures of information content and compares them using multiple HRTF sets.

Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.