An Empirical Bayesian Approach for Testing the Fairness of Automated Scoring

This study proposes an empirical Bayesian approach with loss functions for testing the fairness of an automated scoring algorithm. The proposed method outperforms traditional approaches by (1) being robust to small samples, (2) incorporating parameter uncertainty, and (3) balancing the loss of keeping versus flagging items. The impact of flagging potentially unfair items on the classification of examinees is investigated. The effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated through simulations and an application to language assessment data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986251393501
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Empirical Bayesian Approach for Testing the Fairness of Automated Scoring

Daniel F. McCaffrey, Jodi M. Casabianca, Sunbeom Kwon, Paul A. Jewsbury
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

An Empirical Bayesian Approach for Testing the Fairness of Automated Scoring

Daniel F. McCaffrey, Jodi M. Casabianca, Sunbeom Kwon, Paul A. Jewsbury
article en

Abstract

This study proposes an empirical Bayesian approach with loss functions for testing the fairness of an automated scoring algorithm. The proposed method outperforms traditional approaches by (1) being robust to small samples, (2) incorporating parameter uncertainty, and (3) balancing the loss of keeping versus flagging items. The impact of flagging potentially unfair items on the classification of examinees is investigated. The effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated through simulations and an application to language assessment data.

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Radiometrics (United States) (US), Finnish Medical Society Duodecim (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.