Seismic Resilience Improvement of Reinforced Concrete Building Using Fiber‐Reinforced Concrete Retrofitting

ABSTRACT Reinforced concrete (RC) buildings are common in seismic regions; however, their normal concrete cover (NCC) exhibits brittle behavior, making them vulnerable during earthquakes. While fiber‐reinforced concrete (FRC) has been widely adopted to enhance structural performance, its use as a replacement for NCC in retrofitting remains largely unexplored. Most existing retrofitting approaches—such as RC jacketing, steel bracing, base isolation, damping systems, and fiber‐reinforced polymers (FRPs)—improve strength and energy dissipation but often involve drawbacks including increased member dimensions, added dead load, high cost, fire susceptibility, and complex installation. In contrast, the potential of fiber‐reinforced concrete cover (FRCC) is still underexplored, particularly in India, where seismic codes (IS 1893:2016; IS 13920:2016) provide no specific guidance for its application. To address this gap, the present study investigates a six‐story RC building located in seismic zone V, where NCC is replaced with crimped steel fiber‐reinforced concrete (CSFRC) at 0.5% and 1.0% fiber volume fractions with aspect ratios of 55 and 82, while retaining the NC core. Nonlinear pushover and fragility analyses are performed to evaluate seismic performance in terms of displacement capacity, ductility, energy dissipation, hinge formation, fragility curves, resilience, and repair costs. Results show that incorporating CSF in the concrete matrix increases displacement capacity by up to 57%, global ductility (51%), and resilience (up to 4.83%), leading to a reduction in collapse damage (16%), functionality loss (up to 16.5%), and repair costs (14%). These findings validate FRCC retrofitting as an effective seismic resilience strategy, bridging a crucial gap in Indian seismic codes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering and Resilience
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eer2.70025
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic Resilience Improvement of Reinforced Concrete Building Using Fiber‐Reinforced Concrete Retrofitting

Laxmi Kant Mishra, Goutam Ghosh, Shashi Shekhar Singh, Aman Kumar
Earthquake Engineering and Resilience
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Seismic Resilience Improvement of Reinforced Concrete Building Using Fiber‐Reinforced Concrete Retrofitting

Laxmi Kant Mishra, Goutam Ghosh, Shashi Shekhar Singh, Aman Kumar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reinforced concrete (RC) buildings are common in seismic regions; however, their normal concrete cover (NCC) exhibits brittle behavior, making them vulnerable during earthquakes. While fiber‐reinforced concrete (FRC) has been widely adopted to enhance structural performance, its use as a replacement for NCC in retrofitting remains largely unexplored. Most existing retrofitting approaches—such as RC jacketing, steel bracing, base isolation, damping systems, and fiber‐reinforced polymers (FRPs)—improve strength and energy dissipation but often involve drawbacks including increased member dimensions, added dead load, high cost, fire susceptibility, and complex installation. In contrast, the potential of fiber‐reinforced concrete cover (FRCC) is still underexplored, particularly in India, where seismic codes (IS 1893:2016; IS 13920:2016) provide no specific guidance for its application. To address this gap, the present study investigates a six‐story RC building located in seismic zone V, where NCC is replaced with crimped steel fiber‐reinforced concrete (CSFRC) at 0.5% and 1.0% fiber volume fractions with aspect ratios of 55 and 82, while retaining the NC core. Nonlinear pushover and fragility analyses are performed to evaluate seismic performance in terms of displacement capacity, ductility, energy dissipation, hinge formation, fragility curves, resilience, and repair costs. Results show that incorporating CSF in the concrete matrix increases displacement capacity by up to 57%, global ductility (51%), and resilience (up to 4.83%), leading to a reduction in collapse damage (16%), functionality loss (up to 16.5%), and repair costs (14%). These findings validate FRCC retrofitting as an effective seismic resilience strategy, bridging a crucial gap in Indian seismic codes.

Earthquake Engineering and ResilienceVol. 4(4)
Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.