Beyond single time point self‐report: EMA as a tool for understanding mood and cognition in older adults without dementia

Lower percent of "happy" days and greater percent of "neutral" mood days were related to higher GDS (ρ = -.385, p = .004; ρ = .416, p = .002). Neither EMA mood ratings nor the GDS were related to the cognitive composite. A greater percent of "not sharp" days was related to greater self-reported cognitive decline and functional difficulties (FAQ and Ecog) (ρ = .357, p = .009; ρ = .309, p = .002). Greater percent of "not sharp" days (and ECog) were significantly associated with a lower cognitive composite (ρ=-.279, p = .039; ρ=-.319, p = .018) and higher GDS score (ρ = .408, p = .002; ρ = .384, p = .004) CONCLUSION: Daily EMA mood and subjective cognition measures were significantly related to conventional clinical measures of mood, cognitive decline, and everyday function in expected directions. Subjective cognition (EMA and conventional measures) but not mood (EMA and GDS) was related to objective cognition. Results support the validity of conventional self-report measures and suggest EMA is a valid method for assessing older adults' mood and cognition "in the wild".

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70857_104567
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond single time point self‐report: EMA as a tool for understanding mood and cognition in older adults without dementia

Tania Giovanetti, Marina Kaplan, Sophia Holmqvist, Riya Chaturvedi
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Beyond single time point self‐report: EMA as a tool for understanding mood and cognition in older adults without dementia

Tania Giovanetti, Marina Kaplan, Sophia Holmqvist, Riya Chaturvedi
article en

Abstract

Lower percent of "happy" days and greater percent of "neutral" mood days were related to higher GDS (ρ = -.385, p = .004; ρ = .416, p = .002). Neither EMA mood ratings nor the GDS were related to the cognitive composite. A greater percent of "not sharp" days was related to greater self-reported cognitive decline and functional difficulties (FAQ and Ecog) (ρ = .357, p = .009; ρ = .309, p = .002). Greater percent of "not sharp" days (and ECog) were significantly associated with a lower cognitive composite (ρ=-.279, p = .039; ρ=-.319, p = .018) and higher GDS score (ρ = .408, p = .002; ρ = .384, p = .004) CONCLUSION: Daily EMA mood and subjective cognition measures were significantly related to conventional clinical measures of mood, cognitive decline, and everyday function in expected directions. Subjective cognition (EMA and conventional measures) but not mood (EMA and GDS) was related to objective cognition. Results support the validity of conventional self-report measures and suggest EMA is a valid method for assessing older adults' mood and cognition "in the wild".

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S3)
Temple University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.