AI-guided Spinal Screw Planning for Cervical Spine Procedures

Study Design: Proof-of-concept study. Background: Optimal cervical screw placement is a complex, user-dependent procedure. While advanced techniques, including image-guided surgery and 3D-printed guides, have shown to improve accuracy of this procedure, their success depends on the quality of preoperative planning. However, traditional preoperative planning is labor-intensive, user-dependent, and may overlook patient-specific anatomic nuances. Objective: To develop and evaluate an AI-guided method for planning atlantoaxial and subaxial lateral mass screw trajectories in the cervical spine. Methods: The training of the AI model involved defining the orientation of the atlantoaxial and subaxial screws in all cervical levels on preoperative CT imaging of 41 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery. The model’s performance was evaluated using ten thin-sliced head and neck CT images, effectively simulating clinical applications for various anatomic scenarios. Results: Qualitative evaluation of the AI model demonstrated a 99.3% success rate for defining an identifiable screw trajectory and a 98.6% success rate for identification of the correct vertebral level. Quantitative evaluation of the AI model showed an overall mean screw length of 19.2±3.9 mm, bicortical purchase achievement in 84% of the subaxial screws, an adequate head-to-rod distance in 95.8% of all screws, and a mean runtime of 13.4±4.7 minutes. Conclusions: The developed model represents a valuable step toward the clinical implementation of AI-guided, human-monitored surgical planning for cervical screw placement. By enabling clinicians to primarily verify and fine-tune automated plans, the model reduces workload, saves time, improves accuracy, and minimizes user dependency, which supports safer and more efficient cervical procedures. Further expanding the training dataset to encompass broader spinal pathologies and screw insertion techniques is expected to enhance its clinical value even more.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spine Open
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bn9.0000000000000038
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-guided Spinal Screw Planning for Cervical Spine Procedures

Peter A. J. Pijpker, Jos M.A. Kuijlen, Rob C. Brink, Joep Kraeima et al.
Spine Open
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

AI-guided Spinal Screw Planning for Cervical Spine Procedures

Peter A. J. Pijpker, Jos M.A. Kuijlen, Rob C. Brink, Joep Kraeima, Fleur A. van der Kaaij, J. Marc C. van Dijk
article en

Abstract

Study Design: Proof-of-concept study. Background: Optimal cervical screw placement is a complex, user-dependent procedure. While advanced techniques, including image-guided surgery and 3D-printed guides, have shown to improve accuracy of this procedure, their success depends on the quality of preoperative planning. However, traditional preoperative planning is labor-intensive, user-dependent, and may overlook patient-specific anatomic nuances. Objective: To develop and evaluate an AI-guided method for planning atlantoaxial and subaxial lateral mass screw trajectories in the cervical spine. Methods: The training of the AI model involved defining the orientation of the atlantoaxial and subaxial screws in all cervical levels on preoperative CT imaging of 41 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery. The model’s performance was evaluated using ten thin-sliced head and neck CT images, effectively simulating clinical applications for various anatomic scenarios. Results: Qualitative evaluation of the AI model demonstrated a 99.3% success rate for defining an identifiable screw trajectory and a 98.6% success rate for identification of the correct vertebral level. Quantitative evaluation of the AI model showed an overall mean screw length of 19.2±3.9 mm, bicortical purchase achievement in 84% of the subaxial screws, an adequate head-to-rod distance in 95.8% of all screws, and a mean runtime of 13.4±4.7 minutes. Conclusions: The developed model represents a valuable step toward the clinical implementation of AI-guided, human-monitored surgical planning for cervical screw placement. By enabling clinicians to primarily verify and fine-tune automated plans, the model reduces workload, saves time, improves accuracy, and minimizes user dependency, which supports safer and more efficient cervical procedures. Further expanding the training dataset to encompass broader spinal pathologies and screw insertion techniques is expected to enhance its clinical value even more.

Spine OpenVol. 2(1)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.