Base of Tongue Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment in a Multilevel Setting: Trans-oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) vs Endoscopic Coblation Surgery

Abstract To compare transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with coblation resection for base of tongue surgery in a multilevel setting of OSA surgical treatment. Thirty patients who underwent base of tongue resection with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and thirty patients who underwent coblation resection of the base of the tongue were enrolled in the study. Both groups were compared based on intraoperative findings, respiratory outcomes (apnea/hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, and lowest SpO₂), functional outcomes, and complications. According to the surgeons' experience, tongue base exposure and visualization were better with TORS. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.4) in the success rate between TORS (70%) and coblation resection (63%). TORS and coblation are both effective techniques for base of tongue treatment in OSA patients. The surgical success rate, number of postoperative complications, and anatomical results were similar between the two techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-025-06278-7
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Base of Tongue Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment in a Multilevel Setting: Trans-oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) vs Endoscopic Coblation Surgery

Angelo Eplite, Giovanni Cammaroto, Mario Giuseppe Bellizzi, Jerome Rene Lechien et al.
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

Base of Tongue Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment in a Multilevel Setting: Trans-oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) vs Endoscopic Coblation Surgery

Angelo Eplite, Giovanni Cammaroto, Mario Giuseppe Bellizzi, Jerome Rene Lechien, Annalisa Pace, Claudio Vicini, Giuseppe Magliulo, Enrica Croce, A. Greco, Ahmed Yassin Baghat, Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba, Antonino Maniaci, Armando De Virgilio, Giannicola Iannella, Kenny Pang, Giuseppe Meccariello
article en

Abstract

Abstract To compare transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with coblation resection for base of tongue surgery in a multilevel setting of OSA surgical treatment. Thirty patients who underwent base of tongue resection with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and thirty patients who underwent coblation resection of the base of the tongue were enrolled in the study. Both groups were compared based on intraoperative findings, respiratory outcomes (apnea/hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, and lowest SpO₂), functional outcomes, and complications. According to the surgeons' experience, tongue base exposure and visualization were better with TORS. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.4) in the success rate between TORS (70%) and coblation resection (63%). TORS and coblation are both effective techniques for base of tongue treatment in OSA patients. The surgical success rate, number of postoperative complications, and anatomical results were similar between the two techniques.

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck SurgeryVol. 78(3)
University of Milan (IT), University of Ferrara (IT), Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT), Université de Poitiers (FR), Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute (ES), Asia Centre (TH), Ospedale G.B. Morgagni - L.Pierantoni (IT), Alexandria University (EG), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.