To Touch or to Talk: Individual Preferences, Trust and Empathy in Comforting Behaviours

ABSTRACT Social touch has the power to alleviate physical pain and emotional distress. Here we ask whether touch is perceived as more effective than words in comforting interactions, and whether its effects are influenced by interaction dynamics, individual preferences for touch, propensity to trust, and trait empathy. Across two studies, participants ( n = 199) were exposed to comics depicting comforting interactions between two friends, one experiencing emotional distress and the other providing comfort either verbally or through touch. Results suggest that the comforter's trustworthiness and the interaction positivity increase when the comforting modality matches the one that observers would likely use in their friendships. Tactile interactions and observers' high trait empathy enhance emotional empathy. Social touch therefore emerges as especially impactful in eliciting empathy, yet it may also carry the risk of enhancing personal distress for comforters. Please refer to the section to find this article's community and social impact statement .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70216
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychology of Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Touch or to Talk: Individual Preferences, Trust and Empathy in Comforting Behaviours

Simone Shamay‐Tsoory, Irene Valori, Merle Theresa Fairhurst, Merel M. Jung et al.
1 citations
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Psychology of Social Influence
4.20
article

To Touch or to Talk: Individual Preferences, Trust and Empathy in Comforting Behaviours

Simone Shamay‐Tsoory, Irene Valori, Merle Theresa Fairhurst, Merel M. Jung, Yichen Fan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social touch has the power to alleviate physical pain and emotional distress. Here we ask whether touch is perceived as more effective than words in comforting interactions, and whether its effects are influenced by interaction dynamics, individual preferences for touch, propensity to trust, and trait empathy. Across two studies, participants ( n = 199) were exposed to comics depicting comforting interactions between two friends, one experiencing emotional distress and the other providing comfort either verbally or through touch. Results suggest that the comforter's trustworthiness and the interaction positivity increase when the comforting modality matches the one that observers would likely use in their friendships. Tactile interactions and observers' high trait empathy enhance emotional empathy. Social touch therefore emerges as especially impactful in eliciting empathy, yet it may also carry the risk of enhancing personal distress for comforters. Please refer to the section to find this article's community and social impact statement .

Journal of Community & Applied Social PsychologyVol. 36(1)
Tilburg University (NL), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), University of Haifa (IL)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Technische Universität Dresden
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Psychology of Social Influence
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

To Touch or to Talk: Individual Preferences, Trust and Empathy in Comforting Behaviours — Simone Shamay‐Tsoory, Irene Valori, et al. · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS