Beyond sentiment: Using large language models to decode multidimensional urban park perceptions for enhanced equality

• We systematically benchmarked various deep learning algorithms to interpret perceived park qualities from online reviews. • Our fine-tuned Park-Perception-LLM achieved an accuracy from 83 % to 91 %. • Perception metrics were integrated into an E2SFCA framework to model park accessibility from a quality perspective. • Inequalities in park quality versus quantity, and spatial mismatch patterns are revealed. • Spatiotemporal factors that inform park perceptions are uncovered using multivariate regression. Understanding how people value urban parks is vital for designing liveable and equitable cities, yet the nuanced measurement of park perception proves elusive. While analysis of user-generated content from social media offers scalability over conventional small-sample surveys or objective indicators, deriving effective perceptions beyond basic sentiment, aligned with actionable urban planning variables, remains a crucial challenge. Consequently, a critical gap persists in evaluating inequality in park accessibility through the lens of multi-dimensional quality experiences within diverse urban settings. This hinders truly citizen-centric green space planning and the derivation of insights that transcend quantity. To address this challenge, this study pioneers a systematic benchmarking of large language models (LLMs) and other encoders to classify three perception dimensions—perceived accessibility, usability, and attractiveness—from massive online review data. The fine-tuned Park-Perception-LLM achieved 83–91% accuracy, outperforming other algorithms. Applied to Hong Kong as a representative case of a high-density metropolis, we measured perception scores for 158 urban parks and developed a novel perception-weighted park accessibility metric. This uncovered pronounced inequalities, identifying neighbourhoods with abundant park capacity yet poor experiential quality—a nuanced socio-spatial disparity. Subsequent analysis of perception pathways revealed that diverse facility provision, natural park elements, nearby cultural amenities, and green streetscapes could significantly enhance perceived qualities, whereas monotonous urban forms undermine attractiveness. This LLM-driven framework accurately infers comprehensive perceptions from online reviews, providing a scalable analytical foundation to support planners, designers, and policymakers in integrating perception-based evidence into future park planning, design, and management decisions towards better quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape and Urban Planning
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105571
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond sentiment: Using large language models to decode multidimensional urban park perceptions for enhanced equality

Lingwei Zheng, Qiwei Song, Siyu Tian, Jeroen van Ameijde et al.
2 citations
Landscape and Urban Planning
Urban Green Space and Health
2.40
article

Beyond sentiment: Using large language models to decode multidimensional urban park perceptions for enhanced equality

Lingwei Zheng, Qiwei Song, Siyu Tian, Jeroen van Ameijde, Bo Huang, Yuxuan Zheng, Lin Qiu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• We systematically benchmarked various deep learning algorithms to interpret perceived park qualities from online reviews. • Our fine-tuned Park-Perception-LLM achieved an accuracy from 83 % to 91 %. • Perception metrics were integrated into an E2SFCA framework to model park accessibility from a quality perspective. • Inequalities in park quality versus quantity, and spatial mismatch patterns are revealed. • Spatiotemporal factors that inform park perceptions are uncovered using multivariate regression. Understanding how people value urban parks is vital for designing liveable and equitable cities, yet the nuanced measurement of park perception proves elusive. While analysis of user-generated content from social media offers scalability over conventional small-sample surveys or objective indicators, deriving effective perceptions beyond basic sentiment, aligned with actionable urban planning variables, remains a crucial challenge. Consequently, a critical gap persists in evaluating inequality in park accessibility through the lens of multi-dimensional quality experiences within diverse urban settings. This hinders truly citizen-centric green space planning and the derivation of insights that transcend quantity. To address this challenge, this study pioneers a systematic benchmarking of large language models (LLMs) and other encoders to classify three perception dimensions—perceived accessibility, usability, and attractiveness—from massive online review data. The fine-tuned Park-Perception-LLM achieved 83–91% accuracy, outperforming other algorithms. Applied to Hong Kong as a representative case of a high-density metropolis, we measured perception scores for 158 urban parks and developed a novel perception-weighted park accessibility metric. This uncovered pronounced inequalities, identifying neighbourhoods with abundant park capacity yet poor experiential quality—a nuanced socio-spatial disparity. Subsequent analysis of perception pathways revealed that diverse facility provision, natural park elements, nearby cultural amenities, and green streetscapes could significantly enhance perceived qualities, whereas monotonous urban forms undermine attractiveness. This LLM-driven framework accurately infers comprehensive perceptions from online reviews, providing a scalable analytical foundation to support planners, designers, and policymakers in integrating perception-based evidence into future park planning, design, and management decisions towards better quality of life.

Landscape and Urban PlanningVol. 268
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Urban Green Space and Health
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.