An optimality-theoretic analysis of Iraqi EFL students’ production of English plural forms

Many Iraqi Arabic-speaking learners of English encounter challenges in pronouncing plural endings such as /s/, /z/, and /ɪz/. This study applies Optimality Theory (OT), a linguistic framework that explains pronunciation choices through ranked phonological constraints, to analyse how Iraqi university learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) generate English plural allomorphs (/s/, /z/, /ɪz/). Fifteen Iraqi undergraduate English majors pluralized three monosyllabic nouns ( dish , reef , road ), each triggering a different plural allomorph. These words exemplify the range of phonological challenges Arabic-speaking learners face. Students’ outputs were evaluated against an OT constraint hierarchy (SS >> A GREE >> M AX >> D EP >> I DENT ) to identify optimal (correct) versus suboptimal (incorrect) pluralizations. Results showed that only nine of 45 plural productions were optimal. Accuracy was highest for road (3/15 correct) and reef (4/15), whereas dish had the lowest accuracy (2/15). Suboptimal forms stemmed from constraint violations, such as breaching D EP (vowel insertion (epenthesis)), violating A GREE /I DENT (incorrect voicing assimilation), contravening M AX (omission of the plural suffix), and violating SS (unresolved sibilant clusters). The errors observed can be attributed to negative transfer from Arabic: Learners inserted vowels, reflecting Arabic phonology’s inclination towards consonant–vowel syllable structures (e.g. pronouncing roads as [rəʊdɪz]), and misassigned voicing because of the absence of similar voicing assimilation rules in Arabic (e.g. pronouncing reef as [riːfz]). Limited exposure to varied English inputs and insufficient corrective feedback possibly exacerbated these issues. This study illustrates the effectiveness of OT in identifying pronunciation challenges and emphasizes particular first language (L1) transfer effects impacting Arabic-speaking learners. Pedagogically, the analysis supports focused pronunciation instruction through cluster simplification drills and voicing contrast exercises. By discerning frequent constraint violations, teachers can better target phonological habits shaped by L1 interference. Thus, applying OT to pluralization yields both theoretical insight into cross-linguistic phonology and practical guidance for improving pronunciation teaching for Arabic EFL learners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Teaching Research
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251385606
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An optimality-theoretic analysis of Iraqi EFL students’ production of English plural forms

Aws Al Arabw
Language Teaching Research
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

An optimality-theoretic analysis of Iraqi EFL students’ production of English plural forms

Aws Al Arabw
article en

Abstract

Many Iraqi Arabic-speaking learners of English encounter challenges in pronouncing plural endings such as /s/, /z/, and /ɪz/. This study applies Optimality Theory (OT), a linguistic framework that explains pronunciation choices through ranked phonological constraints, to analyse how Iraqi university learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) generate English plural allomorphs (/s/, /z/, /ɪz/). Fifteen Iraqi undergraduate English majors pluralized three monosyllabic nouns ( dish , reef , road ), each triggering a different plural allomorph. These words exemplify the range of phonological challenges Arabic-speaking learners face. Students’ outputs were evaluated against an OT constraint hierarchy (SS >> A GREE >> M AX >> D EP >> I DENT ) to identify optimal (correct) versus suboptimal (incorrect) pluralizations. Results showed that only nine of 45 plural productions were optimal. Accuracy was highest for road (3/15 correct) and reef (4/15), whereas dish had the lowest accuracy (2/15). Suboptimal forms stemmed from constraint violations, such as breaching D EP (vowel insertion (epenthesis)), violating A GREE /I DENT (incorrect voicing assimilation), contravening M AX (omission of the plural suffix), and violating SS (unresolved sibilant clusters). The errors observed can be attributed to negative transfer from Arabic: Learners inserted vowels, reflecting Arabic phonology’s inclination towards consonant–vowel syllable structures (e.g. pronouncing roads as [rəʊdɪz]), and misassigned voicing because of the absence of similar voicing assimilation rules in Arabic (e.g. pronouncing reef as [riːfz]). Limited exposure to varied English inputs and insufficient corrective feedback possibly exacerbated these issues. This study illustrates the effectiveness of OT in identifying pronunciation challenges and emphasizes particular first language (L1) transfer effects impacting Arabic-speaking learners. Pedagogically, the analysis supports focused pronunciation instruction through cluster simplification drills and voicing contrast exercises. By discerning frequent constraint violations, teachers can better target phonological habits shaped by L1 interference. Thus, applying OT to pluralization yields both theoretical insight into cross-linguistic phonology and practical guidance for improving pronunciation teaching for Arabic EFL learners.

Language Teaching Research
University of Mosul (IQ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.