Monitoring Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Restraint Use in Adult and Pediatric Intensive Care Units: The Multicenter Development and Validation of the CON-Ti-IT Questionnaire

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The use of physical restraints in adult and pediatric intensive care units (ICUs) is common yet controversial. While restraints are intended to prevent treatment interference or self-harm, they pose significant physical, psychological, and ethical risks. Nurses in intensive care units play a key role in decisions about restraint application, but there is a global lack of validated tools to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and practices, particularly in non-English-speaking contexts. Aim of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire for assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of ICU nurses regarding restraint use in adult and pediatric settings. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A multi-method psychometric validation study was conducted across both adult and pediatric ICU settings at two hospitals in northern Italy. Questionnaire development included literature review, expert consultation, and iterative content and face validity assessments. Reliability was tested using test-retest methods, and construct validity was explored through exploratory factor analysis. The study followed COSMIN guidelines. <b>Results:</b> The final CON-Ti-IT questionnaire comprised 29 items across three subscales: Practices, Attitudes, and Knowledge. It demonstrated strong content validity (CVI = 0.96) and good internal consistency for the Practices subscale (Cronbach's α = 0.89). Internal consistency for the Attitudes (α = 0.51) and Knowledge (α = 0.47) subscales was lower, reflecting the broader conceptual variability of these domains. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the structural validity of the tool and led to the removal of three items with low factor loadings. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study presents the first validated tool specifically designed to evaluate ICU nurses' KAP on restraint in adult and pediatric settings. While developed and validated in Italy, it could undergo cross-cultural adaptation and translation for use in other languages and healthcare systems. Its strong psychometric properties support its application in future research, and the data collected through its use can serve both to improve patient care and to provide a foundation for targeted educational initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep16010010
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Restraint Use in Adult and Pediatric Intensive Care Units: The Multicenter Development and Validation of the CON-Ti-IT Questionnaire

Giulia Zamagni, Raffaella Di Meola, Erica Venier, Sara Buchini et al.
Nursing Reports
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Monitoring Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Restraint Use in Adult and Pediatric Intensive Care Units: The Multicenter Development and Validation of the CON-Ti-IT Questionnaire

Giulia Zamagni, Raffaella Di Meola, Erica Venier, Sara Buchini, L. Bertocchi, Raffaella Dobrina, Loredana Dittura, Manuela GIANGRECO, Silvana Schreiber, Patrizia Sartorato, Giorgia Toso, Valentina Guidi, Elisabetta Balestreri
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The use of physical restraints in adult and pediatric intensive care units (ICUs) is common yet controversial. While restraints are intended to prevent treatment interference or self-harm, they pose significant physical, psychological, and ethical risks. Nurses in intensive care units play a key role in decisions about restraint application, but there is a global lack of validated tools to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and practices, particularly in non-English-speaking contexts. Aim of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire for assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of ICU nurses regarding restraint use in adult and pediatric settings. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A multi-method psychometric validation study was conducted across both adult and pediatric ICU settings at two hospitals in northern Italy. Questionnaire development included literature review, expert consultation, and iterative content and face validity assessments. Reliability was tested using test-retest methods, and construct validity was explored through exploratory factor analysis. The study followed COSMIN guidelines. <b>Results:</b> The final CON-Ti-IT questionnaire comprised 29 items across three subscales: Practices, Attitudes, and Knowledge. It demonstrated strong content validity (CVI = 0.96) and good internal consistency for the Practices subscale (Cronbach's α = 0.89). Internal consistency for the Attitudes (α = 0.51) and Knowledge (α = 0.47) subscales was lower, reflecting the broader conceptual variability of these domains. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the structural validity of the tool and led to the removal of three items with low factor loadings. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study presents the first validated tool specifically designed to evaluate ICU nurses' KAP on restraint in adult and pediatric settings. While developed and validated in Italy, it could undergo cross-cultural adaptation and translation for use in other languages and healthcare systems. Its strong psychometric properties support its application in future research, and the data collected through its use can serve both to improve patient care and to provide a foundation for targeted educational initiatives.

Nursing ReportsVol. 16(1)
Boston College (US), IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.