Cultural differences in healthcare: An investigation using cognitive-affective mapping

Refugees in Germany often do not receive the necessary mental healthcare. Understanding refugees' healthcare needs, that is factors that support or hinder their health, can foster the development of effective, culturally appropriate and accessible health services. The present exploratory study investigated these needs using cognitive-affective maps (CAM), a recently developed mind map-like measurement technique enabling participants to visualise their thoughts and emotions as networks. Thirty refugees from diverse regions of origin (West Africa, Middle East and Ukraine) were asked to indicate factors supporting and hindering their health by drawing a CAM using a digital tool. We analysed the drawn CAM concepts qualitatively according to a five-step procedure, including deductive and inductive category formation. Drawn CAM concepts concerning supporting factors were grouped along the categories 'resources' and 'possibilities for explicit treatments of healthcare needs', suggesting an openness to promote well-being among refugees. Yet, various concepts were grouped along the categories 'psychological challenges', 'specific living conditions in Germany' and 'access to healthcare', focusing on factors hindering well-being. Frequency analyses of these categories suggested differences between the subsamples, which should be further investigated in future studies in order to integrate a possible heterogeneity within refugee populations in offered healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Prisms Global Mental Health
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.10126
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural differences in healthcare: An investigation using cognitive-affective mapping

Lasse Sander, Irina Monno, Kerstin Spanhel, Andrea Kiesel et al.
Cambridge Prisms Global Mental Health
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Cultural differences in healthcare: An investigation using cognitive-affective mapping

Lasse Sander, Irina Monno, Kerstin Spanhel, Andrea Kiesel, Julius Fenn, Eva Buschmeyer
article en

Abstract

Refugees in Germany often do not receive the necessary mental healthcare. Understanding refugees' healthcare needs, that is factors that support or hinder their health, can foster the development of effective, culturally appropriate and accessible health services. The present exploratory study investigated these needs using cognitive-affective maps (CAM), a recently developed mind map-like measurement technique enabling participants to visualise their thoughts and emotions as networks. Thirty refugees from diverse regions of origin (West Africa, Middle East and Ukraine) were asked to indicate factors supporting and hindering their health by drawing a CAM using a digital tool. We analysed the drawn CAM concepts qualitatively according to a five-step procedure, including deductive and inductive category formation. Drawn CAM concepts concerning supporting factors were grouped along the categories 'resources' and 'possibilities for explicit treatments of healthcare needs', suggesting an openness to promote well-being among refugees. Yet, various concepts were grouped along the categories 'psychological challenges', 'specific living conditions in Germany' and 'access to healthcare', focusing on factors hindering well-being. Frequency analyses of these categories suggested differences between the subsamples, which should be further investigated in future studies in order to integrate a possible heterogeneity within refugee populations in offered healthcare.

Cambridge Prisms Global Mental HealthVol. 13
University of Freiburg (DE)
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.