How to Design Personalized Affective Pedagogical Agent: The Role of Individual Characteristics and Learner Choice

Prior studies have examined the effects of affective pedagogical agent (PA), revealing mixed results. One possible explanation is that learners’ emotion regulation ability may influence their perception of affective PA, which in turn affects their emotional experiences and learning outcomes. Thus, this study first examines whether learners’ emotion regulation ability serves as a key moderating variable that influences the effectiveness of affective PA. In Experiment 1, learners’ emotion regulation ability moderated the impacts of affective PA on learning. Specifically, affective PA enhanced learning for low emotion regulation ability learners but triggered more negative emotions and lower physiological arousal in high emotion regulation ability learners. Secondly, this study further investigates whether providing learners with the opportunity to make their own choices regarding the functional characteristics of affective PA will be more conducive to learning. In Experiment 2, providing students with the choice of affective PA created a more controllable learning environment for learners and satisfied the need for autonomy. Moreover, autonomous choice of affective PA also increased learners’ physiological arousal and happiness, reduced frustration, and improved germane cognitive load as well as retention performance. These findings help extend prior theories and provide reference for educators to design and develop online learning courses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251410001
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Design Personalized Affective Pedagogical Agent: The Role of Individual Characteristics and Learner Choice

Shaoying Gong, Yanqing Wang, Yang Cao
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

How to Design Personalized Affective Pedagogical Agent: The Role of Individual Characteristics and Learner Choice

Shaoying Gong, Yanqing Wang, Yang Cao
article en

Abstract

Prior studies have examined the effects of affective pedagogical agent (PA), revealing mixed results. One possible explanation is that learners’ emotion regulation ability may influence their perception of affective PA, which in turn affects their emotional experiences and learning outcomes. Thus, this study first examines whether learners’ emotion regulation ability serves as a key moderating variable that influences the effectiveness of affective PA. In Experiment 1, learners’ emotion regulation ability moderated the impacts of affective PA on learning. Specifically, affective PA enhanced learning for low emotion regulation ability learners but triggered more negative emotions and lower physiological arousal in high emotion regulation ability learners. Secondly, this study further investigates whether providing learners with the opportunity to make their own choices regarding the functional characteristics of affective PA will be more conducive to learning. In Experiment 2, providing students with the choice of affective PA created a more controllable learning environment for learners and satisfied the need for autonomy. Moreover, autonomous choice of affective PA also increased learners’ physiological arousal and happiness, reduced frustration, and improved germane cognitive load as well as retention performance. These findings help extend prior theories and provide reference for educators to design and develop online learning courses.

Journal of Educational Computing ResearchVol. 64(3)
Hubei University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Central China Normal University (CN), Hebei Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.