Benchmarking biodiversity integration in environmental assessments

This paper presents the results of a comprehensive analysis of Environmental Assessment (EA) practices across Denmark, Germany, Spain, and Portugal, utilizing a best practices benchmark for integrating biodiversity considerations. The benchmark evaluates the degree of alignment between both Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) reports and best practices for biodiversity integration, offering insights into the effectiveness of current EA practices. We analyzed 191 EA reports, focusing on eight key themes: significance, knowledge, synergies and trade-offs, ecosystem services, goals and visions, uncertainty, mitigation and enhancement, and monitoring. The results highlight both areas of strength, such as the use of monitoring, and areas requiring improvement, such as the integration of ecosystem services and management of synergies and trade-offs. The findings provide a basis for enhancing EA practices and ultimately promoting biodiversity conservation in spatial planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2025.2604367
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking biodiversity integration in environmental assessments

Karla E. Locher‐Krause, Yuanzao Zhu, Lia Laporta, Lone Kørnøv et al.
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
article

Benchmarking biodiversity integration in environmental assessments

Karla E. Locher‐Krause, Yuanzao Zhu, Lia Laporta, Lone Kørnøv, Søren Qvist Eliasen, Davide Geneletti, Heidi Wittmer, Emilia Ravn Boess, Sanne Vammen Larsen, Ana Soares, Margarida Monteiro, Maria Rosario Partidario
article en

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a comprehensive analysis of Environmental Assessment (EA) practices across Denmark, Germany, Spain, and Portugal, utilizing a best practices benchmark for integrating biodiversity considerations. The benchmark evaluates the degree of alignment between both Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) reports and best practices for biodiversity integration, offering insights into the effectiveness of current EA practices. We analyzed 191 EA reports, focusing on eight key themes: significance, knowledge, synergies and trade-offs, ecosystem services, goals and visions, uncertainty, mitigation and enhancement, and monitoring. The results highlight both areas of strength, such as the use of monitoring, and areas requiring improvement, such as the integration of ecosystem services and management of synergies and trade-offs. The findings provide a basis for enhancing EA practices and ultimately promoting biodiversity conservation in spatial planning.

Impact Assessment and Project AppraisalVol. 44(1)
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), University of Lisbon (PT), University of Trento (IT), Aalborg University (DK)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Benchmarking biodiversity integration in environmental assessments — Karla E. Locher‐Krause, Yuanzao Zhu, et al. · Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS