GenAI: a scientometric analysis of research trends using biblioshiny and VOSviewer

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has rapidly emerged as a transformative technology shaping diverse domains such as education, defense, healthcare, industry, tourism, and knowledge management. Despite its expanding influence, the scholarly landscape of GenAI research remains fragmented, making it challenging to trace its growth patterns, collaboration networks, and thematic evolution. To address this gap, this study conducts a comprehensive scientometric analysis to systematically map the intellectual structure and research dynamics of the field. The objective is to identify the most influential authors, institutions, countries, and thematic clusters, thereby providing a holistic view of the development of GenAI research. The study analyzes 9612 documents retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science databases (1986–2025, based on data availability). Data screening followed the PRISMA protocol to ensure transparency and rigor. Advanced bibliometric tools viz. Biblioshiny (R-based Bibliometrix) and VOSviewer were employed to examine productivity indicators, visualize co-authorship networks, and uncover thematic structures using keyword co-occurrence, trend analysis, and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling. The results reveal a steep escalation in GenAI-related publications, increasing by 3164% in Period 2 (2022–24) compared to Period 1 (2012–22), reflecting the disruptive rise of text-generation tools such as OpenAI’s GPT series, ChatGPT, and Gemini. The United States, China, India, and the United Kingdom dominate research output, with Harvard University, Nanyang Technological University, and the University of California leading institutionally. LDA topic modeling identifies ten major thematic clusters, spanning technical design, image synthesis, and large language models to applications in education, healthcare, legal governance, and ethical inquiry. Topic prevalence highlights governance, ethics, and risk (20%) along with AI-driven content creation (17%) as the most explored themes, followed by educational applications (14%). Lotka’s Law analysis further reflects the characteristics of an emerging domain, with numerous occasional contributors and a smaller, prolific core group driving the research front. This study represents a comprehensive scientometric investigations of GenAI to date, integrating performance metrics, network visualizations, and advanced topic modeling. By mapping the intellectual structure, global collaborations, and evolving research trajectories, it offers actionable insights for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to navigate and contribute to this rapidly advancing field. The analysis reveals two dominant directions in GenAI research: governance across sectors and technical or application-specific innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00760-5
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GenAI: a scientometric analysis of research trends using biblioshiny and VOSviewer

Ashok Kumar, Reetu Verma (Maharaja Surajmal Institute of Technology), Kavita Pabreja
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

GenAI: a scientometric analysis of research trends using biblioshiny and VOSviewer

Ashok Kumar, Reetu Verma (Maharaja Surajmal Institute of Technology), Kavita Pabreja
article en

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has rapidly emerged as a transformative technology shaping diverse domains such as education, defense, healthcare, industry, tourism, and knowledge management. Despite its expanding influence, the scholarly landscape of GenAI research remains fragmented, making it challenging to trace its growth patterns, collaboration networks, and thematic evolution. To address this gap, this study conducts a comprehensive scientometric analysis to systematically map the intellectual structure and research dynamics of the field. The objective is to identify the most influential authors, institutions, countries, and thematic clusters, thereby providing a holistic view of the development of GenAI research. The study analyzes 9612 documents retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science databases (1986–2025, based on data availability). Data screening followed the PRISMA protocol to ensure transparency and rigor. Advanced bibliometric tools viz. Biblioshiny (R-based Bibliometrix) and VOSviewer were employed to examine productivity indicators, visualize co-authorship networks, and uncover thematic structures using keyword co-occurrence, trend analysis, and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling. The results reveal a steep escalation in GenAI-related publications, increasing by 3164% in Period 2 (2022–24) compared to Period 1 (2012–22), reflecting the disruptive rise of text-generation tools such as OpenAI’s GPT series, ChatGPT, and Gemini. The United States, China, India, and the United Kingdom dominate research output, with Harvard University, Nanyang Technological University, and the University of California leading institutionally. LDA topic modeling identifies ten major thematic clusters, spanning technical design, image synthesis, and large language models to applications in education, healthcare, legal governance, and ethical inquiry. Topic prevalence highlights governance, ethics, and risk (20%) along with AI-driven content creation (17%) as the most explored themes, followed by educational applications (14%). Lotka’s Law analysis further reflects the characteristics of an emerging domain, with numerous occasional contributors and a smaller, prolific core group driving the research front. This study represents a comprehensive scientometric investigations of GenAI to date, integrating performance metrics, network visualizations, and advanced topic modeling. By mapping the intellectual structure, global collaborations, and evolving research trajectories, it offers actionable insights for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to navigate and contribute to this rapidly advancing field. The analysis reveals two dominant directions in GenAI research: governance across sectors and technical or application-specific innovation.

Discover Artificial IntelligenceVol. 6(1)
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (IN), Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital (IN), Indira Gandhi National Open University (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.