Are Differences in Social Drive in Childhood and Adolescence Diagnosis Specific? A Multimeasurement Subtyping Approach

<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Objective</h3> Altered social drive is a common feature across psychiatric disorders and is embedded in multiple diagnostic criteria, underscoring the need for a transdiagnostic approach. However, the extent to which social drive alterations vary across diagnoses and clinical presentations remains poorly characterized. This study examined whether distinct social drive profiles—defined by differences in social reticence, seeking, and maintaining challenges—relate to variations in clinical features and show specificity to particular neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric conditions. <h3>Method</h3> Data were drawn from the Healthy Brain Network (N=2,380; ages 5–21 years, M [SD] = 10.27 [3.39]; 68% male) and included individuals with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety disorders, autism spectrum disorder, oppositional defiant/conduct disorder, depressive disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and/or tic disorders. Latent profile analysis identified distinct social drive profiles based on constellations of social reticence, seeking, and maintaining challenges. Profiles were compared across demographic, social functioning, and clinical measures, and the distribution of diagnostic categories within each profile was assessed. <h3>Results</h3> Five profiles emerged: Engaged (n=1,530), Inhibited (n=477), Aloof (n=189), Avoidant (n=143), and Constrained (n=50). Profile differences were evident in demographic factors, social functioning, and clinical features. No single diagnosis mapped exclusively onto any profile; rather, individuals with distinct neurodevelopmental or neuropsychiatric diagnoses were distributed across all five profiles. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Psychiatric diagnoses alone may not fully capture alterations in social drive, which appear to transcend diagnostic boundaries. These findings support a transdiagnostic framework and challenge disorder-specific models of social drive differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAACAP Open
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaacop.2025.12.005
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Differences in Social Drive in Childhood and Adolescence Diagnosis Specific? A Multimeasurement Subtyping Approach

Emily Spackman, Lacey Chetcuti, Eric A. Youngstrom, James C. McPartland et al.
JAACAP Open
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Are Differences in Social Drive in Childhood and Adolescence Diagnosis Specific? A Multimeasurement Subtyping Approach

Emily Spackman, Lacey Chetcuti, Eric A. Youngstrom, James C. McPartland, Thomas William Frazier, Eva Loth, A. Y. Hardan, Robert F. Krueger, Mirko Uljarević
article en

Abstract

<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Objective</h3> Altered social drive is a common feature across psychiatric disorders and is embedded in multiple diagnostic criteria, underscoring the need for a transdiagnostic approach. However, the extent to which social drive alterations vary across diagnoses and clinical presentations remains poorly characterized. This study examined whether distinct social drive profiles—defined by differences in social reticence, seeking, and maintaining challenges—relate to variations in clinical features and show specificity to particular neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric conditions. <h3>Method</h3> Data were drawn from the Healthy Brain Network (N=2,380; ages 5–21 years, M [SD] = 10.27 [3.39]; 68% male) and included individuals with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety disorders, autism spectrum disorder, oppositional defiant/conduct disorder, depressive disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and/or tic disorders. Latent profile analysis identified distinct social drive profiles based on constellations of social reticence, seeking, and maintaining challenges. Profiles were compared across demographic, social functioning, and clinical measures, and the distribution of diagnostic categories within each profile was assessed. <h3>Results</h3> Five profiles emerged: Engaged (n=1,530), Inhibited (n=477), Aloof (n=189), Avoidant (n=143), and Constrained (n=50). Profile differences were evident in demographic factors, social functioning, and clinical features. No single diagnosis mapped exclusively onto any profile; rather, individuals with distinct neurodevelopmental or neuropsychiatric diagnoses were distributed across all five profiles. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Psychiatric diagnoses alone may not fully capture alterations in social drive, which appear to transcend diagnostic boundaries. These findings support a transdiagnostic framework and challenge disorder-specific models of social drive differences.

JAACAP OpenVol. 4(2)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), King's College - North Carolina (US), The University of Western Australia (AU), John Carroll University (US), King's College London (GB), University of Minnesota System (US), Yale University (US), Stanford University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.