An Analytical Comparison of Two Daily Pre-Treatment Image Verification Approaches Utilizing Radixact™ Tomotherapy-Based Megavoltage Computed Tomography for Head and Neck Cancer Patients

<i>Introduction:</i> Ensuring accurate patient setup is crucial in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) due to the intricate anatomy and the closeness to vital organs. This study aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness of two different daily pre-treatment auto image registration techniques utilizing Radixact TomoTherapy-based megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) to enhance setup accuracy and treatment consistency. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A prospective analysis was performed on a cohort of twenty HNC patients undergoing treatment with Radixact TomoTherapy. Two image verification techniques were assessed: one focused on aligning bony anatomy (Method A) and the other on adjusting the cross-wire at the center of the planning target volume (PTV) for automatic registration (Method B). Daily MVCT images were taken and analyzed to determine translational setup corrections, which were documented for further analysis. <i>Results:</i> Method B exhibited slightly lower mean systematic errors in both the longitudinal and lateral directions, although the differences were not statistically significant. Method A demonstrated significantly lower errors in the vertical (Z-axis) direction (p = 0.013). Overall displacement vectors favored Method A, yet multivariate analysis indicated no significant difference between the two methods. Therefore, both methods were found to perform similarly, with Method A showing superior vertical alignment. <i>Conclusions:</i> Both auto image registration techniques provide accuracy and dependability, bolstered by reproducible anatomy and clinician supervision. For optimal precision, Method A is suggested for initial gross alignment, followed by Method B for fine-tuning around the target volume, thereby improving dose precision and safety in high-accuracy radiotherapy treatments. <i>Key Messages:</i> Combining initial alignment with Method A and refinement with Method B enhances precision and safety in head and neck radiotherapy, optimizing setup accuracy using Radixact TomoTherapy MVCT imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20251304.17
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Analytical Comparison of Two Daily Pre-Treatment Image Verification Approaches Utilizing Radixact™ Tomotherapy-Based Megavoltage Computed Tomography for Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Anurag Luharia, Rajiv Singh, Subrata Roy, Sunil Maurya et al.
Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

An Analytical Comparison of Two Daily Pre-Treatment Image Verification Approaches Utilizing Radixact™ Tomotherapy-Based Megavoltage Computed Tomography for Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Anurag Luharia, Rajiv Singh, Subrata Roy, Sunil Maurya, Afnan Paikarathodi, Prashik Dube
article en

Abstract

<i>Introduction:</i> Ensuring accurate patient setup is crucial in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) due to the intricate anatomy and the closeness to vital organs. This study aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness of two different daily pre-treatment auto image registration techniques utilizing Radixact TomoTherapy-based megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) to enhance setup accuracy and treatment consistency. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A prospective analysis was performed on a cohort of twenty HNC patients undergoing treatment with Radixact TomoTherapy. Two image verification techniques were assessed: one focused on aligning bony anatomy (Method A) and the other on adjusting the cross-wire at the center of the planning target volume (PTV) for automatic registration (Method B). Daily MVCT images were taken and analyzed to determine translational setup corrections, which were documented for further analysis. <i>Results:</i> Method B exhibited slightly lower mean systematic errors in both the longitudinal and lateral directions, although the differences were not statistically significant. Method A demonstrated significantly lower errors in the vertical (Z-axis) direction (p = 0.013). Overall displacement vectors favored Method A, yet multivariate analysis indicated no significant difference between the two methods. Therefore, both methods were found to perform similarly, with Method A showing superior vertical alignment. <i>Conclusions:</i> Both auto image registration techniques provide accuracy and dependability, bolstered by reproducible anatomy and clinician supervision. For optimal precision, Method A is suggested for initial gross alignment, followed by Method B for fine-tuning around the target volume, thereby improving dose precision and safety in high-accuracy radiotherapy treatments. <i>Key Messages:</i> Combining initial alignment with Method A and refinement with Method B enhances precision and safety in head and neck radiotherapy, optimizing setup accuracy using Radixact TomoTherapy MVCT imaging.

Journal of Cancer Treatment and ResearchVol. 13(4)
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre (IN), Sir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre (IN), Max Super Speciality Hospital (IN), Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (IN), HCG Cancer Centre (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.