Enhancing steer growth and efficiency through growth promoting technologies

Angus-cross (216; 292 ± 22 kg) steers were used to understand the implications of growth promoting technologies on measures of cattle growth, serum metabolites, and nitrogen excretion. Steers were blocked by BW into heavy (16 pens) and light (20 pens), with 6 steers per pen. One of four treatments was applied to each pen. Treatments (TRT) consisted of (i) no implant or β-adrenergic agonist (β-AA; CON), (ii) implants (IMP: Synovex Choice: 100 mg trenbolone acetate, 14 mg estradiol benzoate [d 0]; Synovex Plus: 200 mg trenbolone acetate, 28 mg estradiol benzoate [d 69]), (iii) IMP + β3-agonist lubabegron fumarate (LUB: 36 mg/steer daily for 53 d, 4-d withdrawal), (iv) IMP + β1-agonist ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC: 300 mg/steer daily for 31 d). From terminal implant onwards, study days were held consistent to days relative to harvest for each block. Body weights were recorded and blood was collected on 1 steer per pen on days -1, 0, 69, 98, 116, 141, and 172. Serum urea nitrogen (SUN), glucose, insulin, and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) were analyzed. Insulin sensitivity and urinary nitrogen excretion was estimated. Carcass data were collected following a 48-h chill. Proc Mixed (SAS) was used to analyze data using treatment and block as fixed effects, serum metabolite data were analyzed as repeated measures (day as repeated). Final body weight, average daily gain, dry matter intake, and gain: feed were greater with the use of growth promoting technologies (<i>P <</i> 0.01). Net return tended to be greater in LUB than RAC and CON, IMP was not different from other treatments (<i>P = </i>0.07). Hot carcass weight was greatest in LUB, less in IMP and RAC and least in CON (<i>P <</i> 0.01). Marbling was least in LUB with CON and IMP being greatest and RAC being not different from other treatments (<i>P <</i> 0.01). Urinary nitrogen output decreased per unit of carcass adjusted ADG with the use of growth promoting technologies (<i>P <</i> 0.01). Serum urea nitrogen had a TRT × Day effect (<i>P <</i> 0.01) where CON cattle were generally greater than other treatments until d 172, indicating SUN was less in RAC and IMP, and least in LUB during the LUB feeding period. Insulin sensitivity index values were generally lesser in CON compared to all other treatments and increased greatly in LUB during the β-AA feeding period (TRT × Day; <i>P <</i> 0.01). Growth-promoting technologies reduce the beef industry's environmental footprint and enhance carcass value by improving feed efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Animal Science
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf168
Primary Topic
Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing steer growth and efficiency through growth promoting technologies

Dathan Thomas Smerchek, Jodi L. McGill, Stephanie L Hansen, Marissa K Eekhoff
Translational Animal Science
Pharmacological Effects and Assays
article

Enhancing steer growth and efficiency through growth promoting technologies

Dathan Thomas Smerchek, Jodi L. McGill, Stephanie L Hansen, Marissa K Eekhoff
article en

Abstract

Angus-cross (216; 292 ± 22 kg) steers were used to understand the implications of growth promoting technologies on measures of cattle growth, serum metabolites, and nitrogen excretion. Steers were blocked by BW into heavy (16 pens) and light (20 pens), with 6 steers per pen. One of four treatments was applied to each pen. Treatments (TRT) consisted of (i) no implant or β-adrenergic agonist (β-AA; CON), (ii) implants (IMP: Synovex Choice: 100 mg trenbolone acetate, 14 mg estradiol benzoate [d 0]; Synovex Plus: 200 mg trenbolone acetate, 28 mg estradiol benzoate [d 69]), (iii) IMP + β3-agonist lubabegron fumarate (LUB: 36 mg/steer daily for 53 d, 4-d withdrawal), (iv) IMP + β1-agonist ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC: 300 mg/steer daily for 31 d). From terminal implant onwards, study days were held consistent to days relative to harvest for each block. Body weights were recorded and blood was collected on 1 steer per pen on days -1, 0, 69, 98, 116, 141, and 172. Serum urea nitrogen (SUN), glucose, insulin, and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) were analyzed. Insulin sensitivity and urinary nitrogen excretion was estimated. Carcass data were collected following a 48-h chill. Proc Mixed (SAS) was used to analyze data using treatment and block as fixed effects, serum metabolite data were analyzed as repeated measures (day as repeated). Final body weight, average daily gain, dry matter intake, and gain: feed were greater with the use of growth promoting technologies (<i>P <</i> 0.01). Net return tended to be greater in LUB than RAC and CON, IMP was not different from other treatments (<i>P = </i>0.07). Hot carcass weight was greatest in LUB, less in IMP and RAC and least in CON (<i>P <</i> 0.01). Marbling was least in LUB with CON and IMP being greatest and RAC being not different from other treatments (<i>P <</i> 0.01). Urinary nitrogen output decreased per unit of carcass adjusted ADG with the use of growth promoting technologies (<i>P <</i> 0.01). Serum urea nitrogen had a TRT × Day effect (<i>P <</i> 0.01) where CON cattle were generally greater than other treatments until d 172, indicating SUN was less in RAC and IMP, and least in LUB during the LUB feeding period. Insulin sensitivity index values were generally lesser in CON compared to all other treatments and increased greatly in LUB during the β-AA feeding period (TRT × Day; <i>P <</i> 0.01). Growth-promoting technologies reduce the beef industry's environmental footprint and enhance carcass value by improving feed efficiency.

Translational Animal ScienceVol. 10
Iowa State University (US)
Iowa State University, Zoetis, Elanco Animal Health
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Pharmacological Effects and Assays
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.