Perspectives on the Influence of Pharmaceutical and MedTech Companies on Deprescribing Decisions and Conference Sponsorship: A Survey Study.

Background The involvement and sponsorship of pharmaceutical and medical technology (MedTech) companies in deprescribing and medication optimization activities raise questions about conflicts of interest. We surveyed registrants and attendees of previous International Conferences on Deprescribing to explore views on the acceptability and impact of such involvement and sponsorship.Methods We conducted two unlinked, anonymous cross-sectional surveys among all participants of the 2022 and 2024 International Conferences on Deprescribing (376 unique email addresses). The first survey addressed pharmaceutical companies; the second focused on MedTech. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Free-text responses were analysed thematically.Findings The response rate was 33% (n = 116/355) for the pharmaceutical survey and 20% (n = 68/335) for the MedTech survey. Trust in deprescribing information was low for pharmaceutical companies, with 52% reporting distrust (n = 47/91). Trust was somewhat higher for MedTech companies, with 27% expressing distrust (n = 14/52). Forty-eight percent (n = 42/87) said they would be less likely to attend an international deprescribing conference with pharmaceutical sponsorship versus 26% (n = 13/49) for MedTech. Among clinicians and clinician-scientists who completed the survey, 27% (n = 18/67) said pharmaceutical companies, and 27% (n = 10/37) said MedTech companies, somewhat or very much influence their deprescribing decisions.Conclusions Despite broad scepticism about private-sector involvement and sponsorship of deprescribing activities, views varied.We surveyed clinicians and researchers who attended or registered for two international conferences about safely reducing or stopping medications (deprescribing). We collected their views on drug and medical technology company (MedTech) involvement and sponsorship of future related events. We sent two short surveys that were not linked. The first survey explored views about drug company sponsorship and had a response rate of 33%. The second survey explored views about MedTech sponsorship and had a response rate of 27%. Most people were sceptical about sponsorship from either source but trusted MedTech companies a bit more than drug companies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/93382
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on the Influence of Pharmaceutical and MedTech Companies on Deprescribing Decisions and Conference Sponsorship: A Survey Study.

Barbara Farrell, Caroline McCarthy, Katharina Tabea Jungo, Cynthia M Boyd
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
article

Perspectives on the Influence of Pharmaceutical and MedTech Companies on Deprescribing Decisions and Conference Sponsorship: A Survey Study.

Barbara Farrell, Caroline McCarthy, Katharina Tabea Jungo, Cynthia M Boyd
article en

Abstract

Background The involvement and sponsorship of pharmaceutical and medical technology (MedTech) companies in deprescribing and medication optimization activities raise questions about conflicts of interest. We surveyed registrants and attendees of previous International Conferences on Deprescribing to explore views on the acceptability and impact of such involvement and sponsorship.Methods We conducted two unlinked, anonymous cross-sectional surveys among all participants of the 2022 and 2024 International Conferences on Deprescribing (376 unique email addresses). The first survey addressed pharmaceutical companies; the second focused on MedTech. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Free-text responses were analysed thematically.Findings The response rate was 33% (n = 116/355) for the pharmaceutical survey and 20% (n = 68/335) for the MedTech survey. Trust in deprescribing information was low for pharmaceutical companies, with 52% reporting distrust (n = 47/91). Trust was somewhat higher for MedTech companies, with 27% expressing distrust (n = 14/52). Forty-eight percent (n = 42/87) said they would be less likely to attend an international deprescribing conference with pharmaceutical sponsorship versus 26% (n = 13/49) for MedTech. Among clinicians and clinician-scientists who completed the survey, 27% (n = 18/67) said pharmaceutical companies, and 27% (n = 10/37) said MedTech companies, somewhat or very much influence their deprescribing decisions.Conclusions Despite broad scepticism about private-sector involvement and sponsorship of deprescribing activities, views varied.We surveyed clinicians and researchers who attended or registered for two international conferences about safely reducing or stopping medications (deprescribing). We collected their views on drug and medical technology company (MedTech) involvement and sponsorship of future related events. We sent two short surveys that were not linked. The first survey explored views about drug company sponsorship and had a response rate of 33%. The second survey explored views about MedTech sponsorship and had a response rate of 27%. Most people were sceptical about sponsorship from either source but trusted MedTech companies a bit more than drug companies.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Prince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital (SA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.