Directional sharpness perception under different listening conditions

The assessment of sounds using psychoacoustic parameters is important in many areas. For the binaural case, it is not sufficiently clear how the characteristics of both ear signals have to be combined so that they best reflect the binaural percept. In the case of the auditory sensation of sharpness, this is particularly unclear due to limited empirical data on the perception of sharpness in dichotic listening conditions. To expand the empirical database and allow discussion on calculation methods for binaural sharpness and the derivation of representative metrics reflecting the binaural percept, two listening experiments were designed and conducted. The participants evaluated a series of signals for their sharpness, which were presented as real sound sources in an anechoic chamber via loudspeakers and as virtual sound sources via headphones from different sound source positions in the horizontal plane. Paired comparison and rating scale methods have been used to collect the data. Both experiments on sharpness revealed a tendency towards decreasing sharpness perception across all lateral positions. In contrast to maximum sharpness values of the ipsilateral side, arithmetic and quadratic averaging (mean and RMS values) of sharpness calculated according to the Aures method reflected the listening test results well and appear to be promising approaches for determining a binaural single value for most of the considered signals. Monaural signals and signals with several sound sources showed particular abnormalities in the listening test, some of which cannot be explained well.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025048/pdf
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Directional sharpness perception under different listening conditions

Fabian Brinkmann, Felix Hochbaum, Tony Hundt, André Fiebig
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Directional sharpness perception under different listening conditions

Fabian Brinkmann, Felix Hochbaum, Tony Hundt, André Fiebig
article en

Abstract

The assessment of sounds using psychoacoustic parameters is important in many areas. For the binaural case, it is not sufficiently clear how the characteristics of both ear signals have to be combined so that they best reflect the binaural percept. In the case of the auditory sensation of sharpness, this is particularly unclear due to limited empirical data on the perception of sharpness in dichotic listening conditions. To expand the empirical database and allow discussion on calculation methods for binaural sharpness and the derivation of representative metrics reflecting the binaural percept, two listening experiments were designed and conducted. The participants evaluated a series of signals for their sharpness, which were presented as real sound sources in an anechoic chamber via loudspeakers and as virtual sound sources via headphones from different sound source positions in the horizontal plane. Paired comparison and rating scale methods have been used to collect the data. Both experiments on sharpness revealed a tendency towards decreasing sharpness perception across all lateral positions. In contrast to maximum sharpness values of the ipsilateral side, arithmetic and quadratic averaging (mean and RMS values) of sharpness calculated according to the Aures method reflected the listening test results well and appear to be promising approaches for determining a binaural single value for most of the considered signals. Monaural signals and signals with several sound sources showed particular abnormalities in the listening test, some of which cannot be explained well.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.