A novel approach in quantifying writing errors in Arabic‐speaking patients with Alzheimer's disease

According to our neurocognitive model of agraphia in Arabic (Taiebine et al., 2024), graphemic and post-graphemic buffer errors are produced by patients with moderate AD. The application of the equation for analyzing writing accuracy during the MLSE writing subtest showed different patterns in inter- and intra-individual performances. By averaging the accuracy rate for each patient, we identified 3 groups: those with a high accuracy rate (more than 65%); those with an average accuracy rate (between 40% and 65%) and those with a low accuracy rate (less than 40%). (Table 1) CONCLUSION: This study provides a new perspective in the neurolinguistic characterization of agraphia in AD. The typical pattern of graphemic disorders found in our patients is consistent with the impairment of concomitant triple peripheral writing buffers: graphemic, graphomotor, and allographic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70857_100268
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel approach in quantifying writing errors in Arabic‐speaking patients with Alzheimer's disease

Khadija Al Zemmouri, Maria Benabdeljlil, Mohamed Taiebine, M. El Alaoui Faris et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

A novel approach in quantifying writing errors in Arabic‐speaking patients with Alzheimer's disease

Khadija Al Zemmouri, Maria Benabdeljlil, Mohamed Taiebine, M. El Alaoui Faris, Saadia Aïdi, Mounia Rahmani
article en

Abstract

According to our neurocognitive model of agraphia in Arabic (Taiebine et al., 2024), graphemic and post-graphemic buffer errors are produced by patients with moderate AD. The application of the equation for analyzing writing accuracy during the MLSE writing subtest showed different patterns in inter- and intra-individual performances. By averaging the accuracy rate for each patient, we identified 3 groups: those with a high accuracy rate (more than 65%); those with an average accuracy rate (between 40% and 65%) and those with a low accuracy rate (less than 40%). (Table 1) CONCLUSION: This study provides a new perspective in the neurolinguistic characterization of agraphia in AD. The typical pattern of graphemic disorders found in our patients is consistent with the impairment of concomitant triple peripheral writing buffers: graphemic, graphomotor, and allographic.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S3)
Mohammed V University (MA), Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (US), Euro-Mediterranean University of Fes (MA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A novel approach in quantifying writing errors in Arabic‐speaking patients with Alzheimer's disease — Khadija Al Zemmouri, Maria Benabdeljlil, et al. · Alzheimer s & Dementia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS