Machine Learning Models for Development and Evaluation of Foldscope and Microscopy as Malaria Diagnostic Tool Using Invasive Samples

This study evaluates the development and effectiveness of a Foldscope-based diagnostic tool for detecting malaria parasites, comparing its performance to conventional microscopy. Invasive (blood) samples were collected from consented 50 asymptomatic and 50 symptomatic patients who have provided consent. Additionally, interview were conducted with 20 medical personnel. This was done with approval from University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital (UNIMEDTH) in Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. The cross-sectional study design aimed to assess diagnostic accuracy using metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy. Chi-square Test showed no statistically significant relationships between age and gender groups and the outcome (p > 0.05). Malaria parasite density was below the normal threshold (2483.20 ±437.05 parasite per microliter (parasites/μL)), while parasitized RBCs exceeded normal levels (49.66%). Hemoglobin (11.67 ±2.47 g/dL) and packed cell volume (35.08 ±7.27%) were lower than normal, suggesting potential anemia in infected individuals. Microscopy exhibited higher sensitivity (67%), specificity (75%), and accuracy (70%) compared to Foldscope, which had sensitivity of 56%, specificity of 67%, and accuracy of 60%, making Microscopy the more effective diagnostic tool. Foldscope demonstrates better performance than Microscopy in F1 score (82% vs. 62%) and AUC (0.667 vs. 0.65), indicating better overall diagnostic performance, except in recall, where both methods performed equally well. Medical personnel reported Foldscope easy to use (70%), with 80% satisfied with image quality and 80% found it adequate. Most (84%) recommended it for malaria diagnosis, while only a small percentage disagreed. Overall results indicated that microscopy surpasses the Foldscope in sensitivity and accuracy, but the Foldscope demonstrated potential as a low cost-effective and portable alternative for malaria diagnosis, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18043961
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Models for Development and Evaluation of Foldscope and Microscopy as Malaria Diagnostic Tool Using Invasive Samples

O. A. Agbeyangi, Y. O. Ogunjobi, R. A. Olalekan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
article

Machine Learning Models for Development and Evaluation of Foldscope and Microscopy as Malaria Diagnostic Tool Using Invasive Samples

O. A. Agbeyangi, Y. O. Ogunjobi, R. A. Olalekan
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the development and effectiveness of a Foldscope-based diagnostic tool for detecting malaria parasites, comparing its performance to conventional microscopy. Invasive (blood) samples were collected from consented 50 asymptomatic and 50 symptomatic patients who have provided consent. Additionally, interview were conducted with 20 medical personnel. This was done with approval from University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital (UNIMEDTH) in Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. The cross-sectional study design aimed to assess diagnostic accuracy using metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy. Chi-square Test showed no statistically significant relationships between age and gender groups and the outcome (p > 0.05). Malaria parasite density was below the normal threshold (2483.20 ±437.05 parasite per microliter (parasites/μL)), while parasitized RBCs exceeded normal levels (49.66%). Hemoglobin (11.67 ±2.47 g/dL) and packed cell volume (35.08 ±7.27%) were lower than normal, suggesting potential anemia in infected individuals. Microscopy exhibited higher sensitivity (67%), specificity (75%), and accuracy (70%) compared to Foldscope, which had sensitivity of 56%, specificity of 67%, and accuracy of 60%, making Microscopy the more effective diagnostic tool. Foldscope demonstrates better performance than Microscopy in F1 score (82% vs. 62%) and AUC (0.667 vs. 0.65), indicating better overall diagnostic performance, except in recall, where both methods performed equally well. Medical personnel reported Foldscope easy to use (70%), with 80% satisfied with image quality and 80% found it adequate. Most (84%) recommended it for malaria diagnosis, while only a small percentage disagreed. Overall results indicated that microscopy surpasses the Foldscope in sensitivity and accuracy, but the Foldscope demonstrated potential as a low cost-effective and portable alternative for malaria diagnosis, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Federal University of Technology (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.