Wear behaviour and statistical assessment of organomodified nanoclay reinforced glass fiber epoxy nanocomposites

This study seeks to optimize and evaluate the wear behavior of glass fiber-reinforced epoxy (G-E) nanocomposites incorporating organomodified montmorillonite (oMMT) nanoclay through a rigorous statistical modeling framework. Nanocomposites were prepared with different grades of oMMT (NC-I, NC-II, NC-III, NC-IV) and compared with neat G-E + NC-00 and unmodified NC-V composites. Structural characterization through XRD confirmed enhanced interlayer spacing (up to 5.04 nm for E + NC-III), indicating successful intercalation/exfoliation, while FTIR spectra verified the incorporation of epoxy chains within organoclay galleries. Dry-sliding wear behaviour was evaluated on a pin-on-disc tribometer as per ASTM G99-17 standards, with applied load (8.18-41.82 N), sliding velocity (0.25-2.44 m/s), and sliding distance (318-2177 m) as process variables. Among all tested systems, the G-E + NC-III nanocomposite consistently exhibited the lowest specific wear rate (9.54-40.29 × 10<sup>- 6</sup> mm<sup>3</sup>/Nm), outperforming the neat matrix (10.11-43.33 × 10<sup>- 6</sup> mm<sup>3</sup>/Nm) across all loading and velocity conditions. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Central Composite Design (CCD) were employed to reduce experimental runs and evaluate parameter interactions. ANOVA revealed that applied load was the dominant factor influencing wear, contributing 68.73% in G-E + NC-00 and 69.03% in G-E + NC-III composites, followed by sliding velocity (≈ 7%) and quadratic effects of AL<sup>2</sup> and SV<sup>2</sup> (≈ 12%). Regression models developed for both systems demonstrated excellent correlation with experimental data (R<sup>2</sup> = 96.4% for G-E + NC-00 and 95.65% for G-E + NC-III), with prediction errors ranging between 4.1% and 11.9%. Overall, the incorporation of oMMT nanoclay, particularly NC-III, significantly enhanced interfacial adhesion, promoted uniform dispersion, and reduced wear loss under varying tribological conditions. The statistical analysis confirms Response Surface Methodology (RSM) as a robust and effective approach for predicting wear performance and identifying optimal processing parameters. The optimized formulation (G-E + NC-III) exhibits strong potential for use in high-wear engineering domains such as automotive body panels, aerospace components, and structural assemblies, where the combination of lightweight construction and enhanced durability is critical.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33759-0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Tribology and Wear Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wear behaviour and statistical assessment of organomodified nanoclay reinforced glass fiber epoxy nanocomposites

Ali A. Rajhi, Ali E. Anqi, S. Rajanna, Addisu Frinjo Emma et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Tribology and Wear Analysis
1.73
article

Wear behaviour and statistical assessment of organomodified nanoclay reinforced glass fiber epoxy nanocomposites

Ali A. Rajhi, Ali E. Anqi, S. Rajanna, Addisu Frinjo Emma, K. N. Krishnamurthy, K. J. Santosh Kumar, B. N. Akash Deep, Abdul Razak
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study seeks to optimize and evaluate the wear behavior of glass fiber-reinforced epoxy (G-E) nanocomposites incorporating organomodified montmorillonite (oMMT) nanoclay through a rigorous statistical modeling framework. Nanocomposites were prepared with different grades of oMMT (NC-I, NC-II, NC-III, NC-IV) and compared with neat G-E + NC-00 and unmodified NC-V composites. Structural characterization through XRD confirmed enhanced interlayer spacing (up to 5.04 nm for E + NC-III), indicating successful intercalation/exfoliation, while FTIR spectra verified the incorporation of epoxy chains within organoclay galleries. Dry-sliding wear behaviour was evaluated on a pin-on-disc tribometer as per ASTM G99-17 standards, with applied load (8.18-41.82 N), sliding velocity (0.25-2.44 m/s), and sliding distance (318-2177 m) as process variables. Among all tested systems, the G-E + NC-III nanocomposite consistently exhibited the lowest specific wear rate (9.54-40.29 × 10<sup>- 6</sup> mm<sup>3</sup>/Nm), outperforming the neat matrix (10.11-43.33 × 10<sup>- 6</sup> mm<sup>3</sup>/Nm) across all loading and velocity conditions. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Central Composite Design (CCD) were employed to reduce experimental runs and evaluate parameter interactions. ANOVA revealed that applied load was the dominant factor influencing wear, contributing 68.73% in G-E + NC-00 and 69.03% in G-E + NC-III composites, followed by sliding velocity (≈ 7%) and quadratic effects of AL<sup>2</sup> and SV<sup>2</sup> (≈ 12%). Regression models developed for both systems demonstrated excellent correlation with experimental data (R<sup>2</sup> = 96.4% for G-E + NC-00 and 95.65% for G-E + NC-III), with prediction errors ranging between 4.1% and 11.9%. Overall, the incorporation of oMMT nanoclay, particularly NC-III, significantly enhanced interfacial adhesion, promoted uniform dispersion, and reduced wear loss under varying tribological conditions. The statistical analysis confirms Response Surface Methodology (RSM) as a robust and effective approach for predicting wear performance and identifying optimal processing parameters. The optimized formulation (G-E + NC-III) exhibits strong potential for use in high-wear engineering domains such as automotive body panels, aerospace components, and structural assemblies, where the combination of lightweight construction and enhanced durability is critical.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
University of Mysore (IN), Government of Karnataka (IN), Dilla University (ET), Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IN), King Khalid University (SA)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Tribology and Wear Analysis
1.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.