Is waiting worth it? the value of delaying time window assignment in vehicle routing problems

• We study the balance between immediate and delayed time window communication in next-day delivery. • To assess the value of delay, we propose two online algorithms: one that approximates the value function and another that identifies the most frequent solution among sampled scenarios. • Both algorithms consistently outperform established benchmark policies across multiple performance metrics. • Our results show that allowing customer-specific flexibility in when time windows are communicated yields measurable operational benefits without compromising fairness or service reliability. We explore the critical balance between immediate and delayed communication of time windows to customers in next-day business services, e.g., repairs, high-value deliveries, or installments. Faster communication benefits customers but potentially harms routing quality, including on-time delivery and transport costs. This paper addresses the Dynamic Delayed Time Window Assignment Vehicle Routing Problem (DDTWAVRP), a complex decision-making challenge service providers face. We model the DDTWAVRP as a semi-Markov Decision Process (MDP) with a finite time horizon. We propose two online algorithms as a solution methodology to evaluate the value of delay, namely, the rollout and the multiple scenario approach policy. Rollout policy simulates and approximates the value function to create robust solutions, whereas the multiple scenario approach policy searches for the most popular solution amongst sampled scenarios. We compare the performance of the proposed methodologies with other benchmark policies from the literature. Our numerical study shows an 11.82 % decrease in routing durations if we allow delaying a time window assignment. Compared to only assigning time windows once all demand is known, routing costs only increase marginally. We show that the decision to delay a time window assignment depends on the current state and must be tailored to customers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part B Methodological
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2025.103381
Primary Topic
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is waiting worth it? the value of delaying time window assignment in vehicle routing problems

Albert H. Schrotenboer, Tom Van Woensel, Layla Martin, Şifa Çelik
Transportation Research Part B Methodological
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
article

Is waiting worth it? the value of delaying time window assignment in vehicle routing problems

Albert H. Schrotenboer, Tom Van Woensel, Layla Martin, Şifa Çelik
article en

Abstract

• We study the balance between immediate and delayed time window communication in next-day delivery. • To assess the value of delay, we propose two online algorithms: one that approximates the value function and another that identifies the most frequent solution among sampled scenarios. • Both algorithms consistently outperform established benchmark policies across multiple performance metrics. • Our results show that allowing customer-specific flexibility in when time windows are communicated yields measurable operational benefits without compromising fairness or service reliability. We explore the critical balance between immediate and delayed communication of time windows to customers in next-day business services, e.g., repairs, high-value deliveries, or installments. Faster communication benefits customers but potentially harms routing quality, including on-time delivery and transport costs. This paper addresses the Dynamic Delayed Time Window Assignment Vehicle Routing Problem (DDTWAVRP), a complex decision-making challenge service providers face. We model the DDTWAVRP as a semi-Markov Decision Process (MDP) with a finite time horizon. We propose two online algorithms as a solution methodology to evaluate the value of delay, namely, the rollout and the multiple scenario approach policy. Rollout policy simulates and approximates the value function to create robust solutions, whereas the multiple scenario approach policy searches for the most popular solution amongst sampled scenarios. We compare the performance of the proposed methodologies with other benchmark policies from the literature. Our numerical study shows an 11.82 % decrease in routing durations if we allow delaying a time window assignment. Compared to only assigning time windows once all demand is known, routing costs only increase marginally. We show that the decision to delay a time window assignment depends on the current state and must be tailored to customers.

Transportation Research Part B MethodologicalVol. 204
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.