Nodes, ties, and theories

In the last twenty years, the number of studies applying historical network analysis has grown significantly, in part due to the general “boom” in the digital humanities (although network analysis pre-dates the “digital turn”). Yet how can manifold social interactions be modelled as ties and individuals as nodes in a network for the purpose of quantitative analysis? Many historians approach network analysis in the face of significant amounts of digital data primarily from a quantitative perspective, trying to master the concepts, the mathematics, and the software. But one may ask, how can we perceive the actual correlations between network models and graphs and the social realities of the past? The paper presents some theoretical frameworks for this purpose. First, it examines three of the most elaborate concepts in “relational sociology” by Harrison C. White, Bruno Latour, and Niklas Luhmann. Second, it concentrates on attempts to combine Luhmann’s systems theory with network theory, and some implications for historical medieval network analysis are suggested. Finally, the main points are summed up.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Historical Studies on Central Europe
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47074/hsce.2025-2.01
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nodes, ties, and theories

Johannes Preiser-Kapeller
Historical Studies on Central Europe
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

Nodes, ties, and theories

Johannes Preiser-Kapeller
article en

Abstract

In the last twenty years, the number of studies applying historical network analysis has grown significantly, in part due to the general “boom” in the digital humanities (although network analysis pre-dates the “digital turn”). Yet how can manifold social interactions be modelled as ties and individuals as nodes in a network for the purpose of quantitative analysis? Many historians approach network analysis in the face of significant amounts of digital data primarily from a quantitative perspective, trying to master the concepts, the mathematics, and the software. But one may ask, how can we perceive the actual correlations between network models and graphs and the social realities of the past? The paper presents some theoretical frameworks for this purpose. First, it examines three of the most elaborate concepts in “relational sociology” by Harrison C. White, Bruno Latour, and Niklas Luhmann. Second, it concentrates on attempts to combine Luhmann’s systems theory with network theory, and some implications for historical medieval network analysis are suggested. Finally, the main points are summed up.

Historical Studies on Central EuropeVol. 5(2)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.