Russia as an Existential Challenge: Moral Machinery, Strategic Logic, and What the Free World Must Do

Working paper (Version 1, 2025). This paper is a public working draft and has not been peer reviewed. Comments welcome. Abstract: This essay argues that Putin’s Russia constitutes an existential challenge to the post-1945 security and moral order: not simply a revisionist state pursuing limited bargains, but a regime whose internal reproduction is tied to external coercion. In such systems, war is not an episodic instrument; it becomes a governance mode, a moral permission structure, and an administrative technology for dissolving responsibility. The paper connects three levels of analysis: (1) the historical arc from post-Soviet illusion to serial aggression (Chechnya, Georgia, Crimea/Donbas, and the full-scale invasion of Ukraine); (2) regime typology, including the problem of “fascization” as described by comparative researchers; and (3) the ethical mechanics by which societies can retain moral language while losing moral agency—a condition I have elsewhere called “moral sterilization”. Against this background, the paper tests competing prescriptions: restraint and negotiated settlement versus deterrence and containment with sustained support for Ukraine. It concludes that appeasement fails not only tactically but structurally: it teaches the regime that coercion works and the defender—that escalation is more frightening than defeat. The strategic task, therefore, is to restore the ethics of responsibility to politics: to ensure, in practice, that aggression does not pay; to build institutional resilience against hybrid coercion; and to prepare for the long moral work of post-war reconstruction and accountability without collapsing into collective hatred or nihilism. Keywords: Russia; Ukraine; Russia–Ukraine war; deterrence; containment; coercion; hybrid warfare; fascization; ethics of war; moral sterilization; responsibility ethics; appeasement; institutional resilience; accountability. Suggested citation: Kolesnikov, R. (2025). Russia as an Existential Challenge: Moral Machinery, Strategic Logic, and What the Free World Must Do [Working paper]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18047221 Contact: [email protected]

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18047220
Primary Topic
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Russia as an Existential Challenge: Moral Machinery, Strategic Logic, and What the Free World Must Do

Rodion Kolesnikov
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
article

Russia as an Existential Challenge: Moral Machinery, Strategic Logic, and What the Free World Must Do

Rodion Kolesnikov
article en

Abstract

Working paper (Version 1, 2025). This paper is a public working draft and has not been peer reviewed. Comments welcome. Abstract: This essay argues that Putin’s Russia constitutes an existential challenge to the post-1945 security and moral order: not simply a revisionist state pursuing limited bargains, but a regime whose internal reproduction is tied to external coercion. In such systems, war is not an episodic instrument; it becomes a governance mode, a moral permission structure, and an administrative technology for dissolving responsibility. The paper connects three levels of analysis: (1) the historical arc from post-Soviet illusion to serial aggression (Chechnya, Georgia, Crimea/Donbas, and the full-scale invasion of Ukraine); (2) regime typology, including the problem of “fascization” as described by comparative researchers; and (3) the ethical mechanics by which societies can retain moral language while losing moral agency—a condition I have elsewhere called “moral sterilization”. Against this background, the paper tests competing prescriptions: restraint and negotiated settlement versus deterrence and containment with sustained support for Ukraine. It concludes that appeasement fails not only tactically but structurally: it teaches the regime that coercion works and the defender—that escalation is more frightening than defeat. The strategic task, therefore, is to restore the ethics of responsibility to politics: to ensure, in practice, that aggression does not pay; to build institutional resilience against hybrid coercion; and to prepare for the long moral work of post-war reconstruction and accountability without collapsing into collective hatred or nihilism. Keywords: Russia; Ukraine; Russia–Ukraine war; deterrence; containment; coercion; hybrid warfare; fascization; ethics of war; moral sterilization; responsibility ethics; appeasement; institutional resilience; accountability. Suggested citation: Kolesnikov, R. (2025). Russia as an Existential Challenge: Moral Machinery, Strategic Logic, and What the Free World Must Do [Working paper]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18047221 Contact: [email protected]

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Russia as an Existential Challenge: Moral Machinery, Strategic Logic, and What the Free World Must Do — Rodion Kolesnikov · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS