Fair Harmonization. How can we harmonize digital cognitive tools while also preserving local culture and context?

An internationally harmonized and cross-culturally relevant brain health index is needed for accurate global tracking and forecasting of brain health loss attributable to infectious diseases, high-risk human behaviors, and environmental exposures. The index should be able to: (1) absorb advances in digital assessment tools; (2) quantify brain health at the level of the individual and population; (3) characterize the burden, severity, and profile of brain health loss; (4) track changes in brain health over time and as the result of interventions; and (5) preserve sociocultural norms and linguistic diversity. An International Brain Health Index (IMBHI) is proposed to accomplish these aims by leveraging the Alkire-Foster counting method, which has successfully harmonized poverty estimation across financially, geographically, and culturally diverse settings. This approach allows for flexibility at the level of indicators and cut-off values, while harmonizing domains, healthy control criterion, and an actuarial approach to classifying brain health loss. The stepwise process for deriving the IBHI includes Step 1. Select setting and unit of analysis (individual/population). Step 2. Select brain health domains. Step 3. Select brain health indicators to assess each domain (cognitive tests, scales, and digital tools validated in the target setting). Step 4. Utilize context-specific indicator cut-offs for a "low" score, defined by downward deviation from local normative reference groups. Step 5. Establish brain health domain deprivations. If more than one indicator is classified as "low" within a domain, then classify as "deprived". Step 6. Sum domain deprivations, then divide by the total number of domains to arrive at a percentage of brain health deprivations. Step 7. Classify "brain health loss" by determining whether the percentage of brain health domain deprivations exceeds established thresholds. Step 8. Calculate the total burden, severity, and profile of brain health loss. The IBHI has the potential to model the individual- and population-level burden of brain health loss across LMICs. By allowing for local autonomy in indicator selection, it overcomes barriers to absorption of novel digital tools and addresses measurement imprecision in regions where existing neuropsychological tools have limited validity. This approach to fair harmonization is essential for advancement towards global brain health equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70857_097258
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fair Harmonization. How can we harmonize digital cognitive tools while also preserving local culture and context?

Karen Blackmon
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Fair Harmonization. How can we harmonize digital cognitive tools while also preserving local culture and context?

Karen Blackmon
article en

Abstract

An internationally harmonized and cross-culturally relevant brain health index is needed for accurate global tracking and forecasting of brain health loss attributable to infectious diseases, high-risk human behaviors, and environmental exposures. The index should be able to: (1) absorb advances in digital assessment tools; (2) quantify brain health at the level of the individual and population; (3) characterize the burden, severity, and profile of brain health loss; (4) track changes in brain health over time and as the result of interventions; and (5) preserve sociocultural norms and linguistic diversity. An International Brain Health Index (IMBHI) is proposed to accomplish these aims by leveraging the Alkire-Foster counting method, which has successfully harmonized poverty estimation across financially, geographically, and culturally diverse settings. This approach allows for flexibility at the level of indicators and cut-off values, while harmonizing domains, healthy control criterion, and an actuarial approach to classifying brain health loss. The stepwise process for deriving the IBHI includes Step 1. Select setting and unit of analysis (individual/population). Step 2. Select brain health domains. Step 3. Select brain health indicators to assess each domain (cognitive tests, scales, and digital tools validated in the target setting). Step 4. Utilize context-specific indicator cut-offs for a "low" score, defined by downward deviation from local normative reference groups. Step 5. Establish brain health domain deprivations. If more than one indicator is classified as "low" within a domain, then classify as "deprived". Step 6. Sum domain deprivations, then divide by the total number of domains to arrive at a percentage of brain health deprivations. Step 7. Classify "brain health loss" by determining whether the percentage of brain health domain deprivations exceeds established thresholds. Step 8. Calculate the total burden, severity, and profile of brain health loss. The IBHI has the potential to model the individual- and population-level burden of brain health loss across LMICs. By allowing for local autonomy in indicator selection, it overcomes barriers to absorption of novel digital tools and addresses measurement imprecision in regions where existing neuropsychological tools have limited validity. This approach to fair harmonization is essential for advancement towards global brain health equity.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S3)
Dartmouth College (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.