Priority Geostrategic Regions of Spatial Development Strategies for Russia

The article examines the issues of selecting objects of priority state support in strategic planning documents and assesses the approach to defining geostrategic territories in the Strategy for Spatial Development of the Russian Federation adopted in 2019 and in the new version adopted in 2024. It is shown that the criteria for classifying regions as geostrategic (or nongeostrategic) are not specific, which prevents targeting of state support at solving those problems in the development of regions that are due to their geostrategic position. It is shown that the choice of the accelerated rates of economic growth and quality of life of the population as target indicators for priority geostrategic regions was unjustified; the target indicators were objectively unattainable. The article presents assessments of the use of institutional mechanisms that ensure the priority development of geostrategic regions: state programs and preferential regimes. The issues of implementing a new priority of spatial development—reference settlements in geostrategic regions—are considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Research of Russia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s2079970525600647
Primary Topic
Regional Economic Development and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Priority Geostrategic Regions of Spatial Development Strategies for Russia

N. N. Mikheeva
Regional Research of Russia
Regional Economic Development and Innovation
article

Priority Geostrategic Regions of Spatial Development Strategies for Russia

N. N. Mikheeva
article en

Abstract

The article examines the issues of selecting objects of priority state support in strategic planning documents and assesses the approach to defining geostrategic territories in the Strategy for Spatial Development of the Russian Federation adopted in 2019 and in the new version adopted in 2024. It is shown that the criteria for classifying regions as geostrategic (or nongeostrategic) are not specific, which prevents targeting of state support at solving those problems in the development of regions that are due to their geostrategic position. It is shown that the choice of the accelerated rates of economic growth and quality of life of the population as target indicators for priority geostrategic regions was unjustified; the target indicators were objectively unattainable. The article presents assessments of the use of institutional mechanisms that ensure the priority development of geostrategic regions: state programs and preferential regimes. The issues of implementing a new priority of spatial development—reference settlements in geostrategic regions—are considered.

Regional Research of RussiaVol. 15(4)
Institute of Economic Forecasting (RU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Regional Economic Development and Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.