Subjective estimation of cognitive function in mild cognitive impairment: relationship with neurodegenerative and non-degenerative factors.

BACKGROUND: Subjective cognitive complaints are poor predictors of neurodegenerative disease and future dementia. Errors in metacognition, positive or negative differences between actual and perceived performance, may partially explain this. We aimed to assess whether hypothesized indicators of underlying neurodegenerative factors (e.g. hippocampal atrophy) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were associated with overestimation of actual cognitive performance, and hypothesized non-degenerative factors (e.g. depression) were associated with underestimation of performance. METHODS: Metacognitive error was estimated from paired subjective and objective cognitive assessments using the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination - Revised, respectively. A normative model was developed with cognitively healthy older adults (n = 36), and applied to individuals with suspected MCI due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or MCI with Lewy bodies (total n = 88). Theorized predictors of subjective overestimation or underestimation of performance (metacognitive error) were assessed, including demographics, AD biomarkers, and mental and physical ill health. Metacognitive error was also assessed as a predictor of conversion to dementia. RESULTS: Underestimation of cognitive function was associated with depressive symptoms, anxiety, and self-reported autonomic symptoms. Overestimation of cognitive function was associated with age, hippocampal atrophy, plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein, and subsequent dementia conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Underestimation of cognitive function may reflect functional cognitive changes linked to mental and physical ill health, while overestimation of function may be a marker of neurodegenerative changes. Quantifying metacognitive error may provide a noninvasive screening tool for progressive MCI, requiring investigation in an independent sample.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.124388
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subjective estimation of cognitive function in mild cognitive impairment: relationship with neurodegenerative and non-degenerative factors.

Gemma Roberts, Joanna Ciafone, Paul C. Donaghy, Amanda J Heslegrave et al.
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Subjective estimation of cognitive function in mild cognitive impairment: relationship with neurodegenerative and non-degenerative factors.

Gemma Roberts, Joanna Ciafone, Paul C. Donaghy, Amanda J Heslegrave, Michael J Firbank, Henrik Zetterberg, Alan Thomas, Calum Hamilton, John-Paul Taylor, Allan Louise, John O'Brien, Peter Gallagher
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subjective cognitive complaints are poor predictors of neurodegenerative disease and future dementia. Errors in metacognition, positive or negative differences between actual and perceived performance, may partially explain this. We aimed to assess whether hypothesized indicators of underlying neurodegenerative factors (e.g. hippocampal atrophy) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were associated with overestimation of actual cognitive performance, and hypothesized non-degenerative factors (e.g. depression) were associated with underestimation of performance. METHODS: Metacognitive error was estimated from paired subjective and objective cognitive assessments using the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination - Revised, respectively. A normative model was developed with cognitively healthy older adults (n = 36), and applied to individuals with suspected MCI due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or MCI with Lewy bodies (total n = 88). Theorized predictors of subjective overestimation or underestimation of performance (metacognitive error) were assessed, including demographics, AD biomarkers, and mental and physical ill health. Metacognitive error was also assessed as a predictor of conversion to dementia. RESULTS: Underestimation of cognitive function was associated with depressive symptoms, anxiety, and self-reported autonomic symptoms. Overestimation of cognitive function was associated with age, hippocampal atrophy, plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein, and subsequent dementia conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Underestimation of cognitive function may reflect functional cognitive changes linked to mental and physical ill health, while overestimation of function may be a marker of neurodegenerative changes. Quantifying metacognitive error may provide a noninvasive screening tool for progressive MCI, requiring investigation in an independent sample.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.