Stability of Medications Administered via Enteral Feeding Tubes: A Systematic Review

Feeding tubes are essential for patients unable to maintain adequate oral intake, serving multiple purposes including nutrition delivery and medication administration. The impact of administering medications through feeding tubes on their stability requires systematic investigation. This review aims to systematically evaluate factors affecting medication stability when administered via enteral feeding tubes versus oral administration in healthy populations, focusing on solid dosage forms converted to liquid formulations. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases from July to October 2024, using a combination of MeSH and non-MeSH terms. Studies that assessed medication stability in enteral feeding tubes were included, while those that did not report on this outcome were excluded. The risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I, RoB- II, Cochrane tools, and the QUIN tool. From 2368 articles, 115 were retained for further assessment, and finally 24 met the inclusion criteria and were included, comprising 16 in vivo, 4 in vitro, and 4 combined studies. Approximately 20.8% of the studies found reduced stability/bioavailability for certain medications, such as warfarin and tolvaptan, while 8.3% of the studies found enhanced absorption, as observed with clopidogrel. Most medications maintained their stability. This systematic review suggests that enteral feeding tube administration can variably affect medication stability, influenced by factors such as tube material and preparation methods. Although most medications remain stable, concerns regarding instability and quality persist. The findings of this review provide a foundation for developing evidence-based guidelines to optimize clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70427
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stability of Medications Administered via Enteral Feeding Tubes: A Systematic Review

Ayman Allahham, Wejdan Shahin, Lina Breik, Lena Alodat
Clinical and Translational Science
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

Stability of Medications Administered via Enteral Feeding Tubes: A Systematic Review

Ayman Allahham, Wejdan Shahin, Lina Breik, Lena Alodat
article en

Abstract

Feeding tubes are essential for patients unable to maintain adequate oral intake, serving multiple purposes including nutrition delivery and medication administration. The impact of administering medications through feeding tubes on their stability requires systematic investigation. This review aims to systematically evaluate factors affecting medication stability when administered via enteral feeding tubes versus oral administration in healthy populations, focusing on solid dosage forms converted to liquid formulations. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases from July to October 2024, using a combination of MeSH and non-MeSH terms. Studies that assessed medication stability in enteral feeding tubes were included, while those that did not report on this outcome were excluded. The risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I, RoB- II, Cochrane tools, and the QUIN tool. From 2368 articles, 115 were retained for further assessment, and finally 24 met the inclusion criteria and were included, comprising 16 in vivo, 4 in vitro, and 4 combined studies. Approximately 20.8% of the studies found reduced stability/bioavailability for certain medications, such as warfarin and tolvaptan, while 8.3% of the studies found enhanced absorption, as observed with clopidogrel. Most medications maintained their stability. This systematic review suggests that enteral feeding tube administration can variably affect medication stability, influenced by factors such as tube material and preparation methods. Although most medications remain stable, concerns regarding instability and quality persist. The findings of this review provide a foundation for developing evidence-based guidelines to optimize clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 19(1)
Monash University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Monash University
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.