Nanoplastic and microplastic contamination in Australian carbonated beverages: Measurement by pyrolysis-GC-MS and the challenge of poly(ethylene terephthalate) oligomer interference

Bottled beverages are increasingly recognised as an important source of dietary exposure to nanoplastics (NP) and microplastics (MP), with source water speculated to contribute to contamination. This study assessed the extent to which the fingerprint of local water sources contributes to NP and MP contamination of Australian carbonated beverages, and examined the utility of the method proposed in the Draft ISO Standard: Water quality — Analysis of microplastic in water —Part 3: Thermo-analytical methods for waters with low content of suspended solids including drinking water for application to carbonated beverages. Pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Pyr-GC-MS) was used to quantify NP and MP in bottled and soda-fountain beverages manufactured in Australia. In bottled beverages, polypropylene (<MDL - 0.45 µg/L), poly(methyl methacrylate) (0.003 - 0.09 µg/L), polycarbonate (<MDL - 1.4), nylon 6 (<MDL - 1.12), and nylon 6,6 (0.11 - 7.2 µg/L) were detected across all size fractions analysed (>2.7 µm, 2.7 - 1.0 µm, and 1.0 - 0.3 µm). Polypropylene, poly(methyl methacrylate), polystyrene, nylon 6 and nylon 6,6 were also detected in soda fountain carbonated beverages. Comparison of NP and MP concentrations revealed no similarity between bottled carbonated beverages and bottled water from the same manufacturer, or between soda fountain beverages and tap water collected at the same location. Quantification of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was further assessed for accuracy due to frequent detection of high concentrations of pyrolysis products. PET oligomers (repeating units of ethylene terephthalate) were identified as an important interference for PET analysis by Pyr-GC-MS, as they form the same pyrolysis products in both single and double shot mode, providing a false positive PET detection. PET could not therefore be confidently quantified. This study provides preliminary evidence of MP and NP in store bought carbonated beverages, and also provides the first evidence of oligomer interference, further highlighting the challenges of quantifying PET in water using Pyr-GC-MS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hazardous Materials Plastics
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazmp.2025.100035
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nanoplastic and microplastic contamination in Australian carbonated beverages: Measurement by pyrolysis-GC-MS and the challenge of poly(ethylene terephthalate) oligomer interference

Cassandra Rauert, Kevin Victor Thomas, Coral Jeffries
Journal of Hazardous Materials Plastics
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Nanoplastic and microplastic contamination in Australian carbonated beverages: Measurement by pyrolysis-GC-MS and the challenge of poly(ethylene terephthalate) oligomer interference

Cassandra Rauert, Kevin Victor Thomas, Coral Jeffries
article en

Abstract

Bottled beverages are increasingly recognised as an important source of dietary exposure to nanoplastics (NP) and microplastics (MP), with source water speculated to contribute to contamination. This study assessed the extent to which the fingerprint of local water sources contributes to NP and MP contamination of Australian carbonated beverages, and examined the utility of the method proposed in the Draft ISO Standard: Water quality — Analysis of microplastic in water —Part 3: Thermo-analytical methods for waters with low content of suspended solids including drinking water for application to carbonated beverages. Pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Pyr-GC-MS) was used to quantify NP and MP in bottled and soda-fountain beverages manufactured in Australia. In bottled beverages, polypropylene (<MDL - 0.45 µg/L), poly(methyl methacrylate) (0.003 - 0.09 µg/L), polycarbonate (<MDL - 1.4), nylon 6 (<MDL - 1.12), and nylon 6,6 (0.11 - 7.2 µg/L) were detected across all size fractions analysed (>2.7 µm, 2.7 - 1.0 µm, and 1.0 - 0.3 µm). Polypropylene, poly(methyl methacrylate), polystyrene, nylon 6 and nylon 6,6 were also detected in soda fountain carbonated beverages. Comparison of NP and MP concentrations revealed no similarity between bottled carbonated beverages and bottled water from the same manufacturer, or between soda fountain beverages and tap water collected at the same location. Quantification of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was further assessed for accuracy due to frequent detection of high concentrations of pyrolysis products. PET oligomers (repeating units of ethylene terephthalate) were identified as an important interference for PET analysis by Pyr-GC-MS, as they form the same pyrolysis products in both single and double shot mode, providing a false positive PET detection. PET could not therefore be confidently quantified. This study provides preliminary evidence of MP and NP in store bought carbonated beverages, and also provides the first evidence of oligomer interference, further highlighting the challenges of quantifying PET in water using Pyr-GC-MS.

Journal of Hazardous Materials PlasticsVol. 2
The University of Queensland (AU)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.