Wall Suction on Laminar Separation Bubbles and Crossflow Instability of a Supersonic Finite-Span Swept Wing

This integrated study quantifies the suction intensity (Cq) effects on shock-induced laminar separation bubbles (LSBs) and crossflow instability on a supersonic finite-span 65° swept wing at a Mach number equal to 2 and a unit Reynolds number 3.29 × 107 m–1. Results demonstrate that low-strength suction (Cq < 0.01) triggers the LSBs through recompression-shock-induced adverse pressure gradients. Conversely, high-strength suction (Cq > 0.01) suppresses the LSBs by establishing sustained favorable pressure gradients. At the threshold Cq = 0.01, flow control is balanced: uniform N-factor distribution is maintained while crossflow instability growth is suppressed; beyond this threshold (Cq > 0.01), however, suction amplifies crossflow instability. These results resolve the trade-off between separation suppression and instability mitigation, establishing Cq = 0.01 as the optimal design parameter for crossflow instability delay in supersonic swept wings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fluid Dynamics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0015462825601792
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wall Suction on Laminar Separation Bubbles and Crossflow Instability of a Supersonic Finite-Span Swept Wing

Z. H. Han, L. Wang, M. C. Duan, G. H. Tu et al.
1 citations
Fluid Dynamics
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
1.33
article

Wall Suction on Laminar Separation Bubbles and Crossflow Instability of a Supersonic Finite-Span Swept Wing

Z. H. Han, L. Wang, M. C. Duan, G. H. Tu, C. Q. Li, X. Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This integrated study quantifies the suction intensity (Cq) effects on shock-induced laminar separation bubbles (LSBs) and crossflow instability on a supersonic finite-span 65° swept wing at a Mach number equal to 2 and a unit Reynolds number 3.29 × 107 m–1. Results demonstrate that low-strength suction (Cq < 0.01) triggers the LSBs through recompression-shock-induced adverse pressure gradients. Conversely, high-strength suction (Cq > 0.01) suppresses the LSBs by establishing sustained favorable pressure gradients. At the threshold Cq = 0.01, flow control is balanced: uniform N-factor distribution is maintained while crossflow instability growth is suppressed; beyond this threshold (Cq > 0.01), however, suction amplifies crossflow instability. These results resolve the trade-off between separation suppression and instability mitigation, establishing Cq = 0.01 as the optimal design parameter for crossflow instability delay in supersonic swept wings.

Fluid DynamicsVol. 60(6)
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center (CN), Craft Group (China) (CN), Beihang University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.