Caesarean section rates in public vs private hospitals in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Robson ten group classification system

High CS rates were observed across Europe, with Southern Europe reporting the highest levels. Rates were consistently higher in private compared to public hospitals. In both settings, Group 5 (women with a previous CS) was the largest contributor to the overall CS rate. However, low-risk women in private hospitals (Groups 1 and 2) had twice the CS rates compared with public hospitals. These findings highlight that the excess CS burden in private hospitals is largely driven by unnecessary procedures in low-risk groups. There is an urgent need for interventions that promote evidence-based care and reduce unnecessary CS especially among low-risk women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114921
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caesarean section rates in public vs private hospitals in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Robson ten group classification system

Mehreen Zaigham, Charles Savona-Ventura, Viktoria El Radaf, Tahir Mahmood et al.
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Caesarean section rates in public vs private hospitals in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Robson ten group classification system

Mehreen Zaigham, Charles Savona-Ventura, Viktoria El Radaf, Tahir Mahmood, Sara Ebadi
article en

Abstract

High CS rates were observed across Europe, with Southern Europe reporting the highest levels. Rates were consistently higher in private compared to public hospitals. In both settings, Group 5 (women with a previous CS) was the largest contributor to the overall CS rate. However, low-risk women in private hospitals (Groups 1 and 2) had twice the CS rates compared with public hospitals. These findings highlight that the excess CS burden in private hospitals is largely driven by unnecessary procedures in low-risk groups. There is an urgent need for interventions that promote evidence-based care and reduce unnecessary CS especially among low-risk women.

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyVol. 318
Lund University (SE), University of Malta (MT), National Measurement Laboratory (AU), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Lasarettet i Ystad (SE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.