The history of the study of settlements from the Middle Bronze Age in mountainous Dagestan

The article is dedicated to the history of the study of settlements of the Middle Bronze Age in mountainous Dagestan. Researching these settlements will shed light on issues of local specificity and the patterns of cultural-historical, socio-economic, and ethno-cultural development in areas with a high intensity of contact among various cultures. The article focuses on the historiography of the study of Middle Bronze Age settlements in the mountainous Republic of Dagestan, highlighting stages of research and summarizing the results. The first stage – pre-Soviet – from 1880 to 1917; the second stage – from 1918 to 1941; the third stage – from 1945 to 1951; the fourth stage – from 1951 to 1973; the fifth stage – from 1974 to 1991; the sixth stage – from 1992 to 2024. There are prerequisites for a detailed study of Bronze Age settlements in mountainous Dagestan. These are based on significant materials obtained and comparative data from other regions of Dagestan and the Caucasus. A large amount of material has been accumulated from settlements and cemeteries. An important circumstance is the presence of substantial research in the archaeology of Dagestan and the Caucasus, the data of which are analyzed in the article. The article analyzes perspectives on issues related to the study and interpretation of materials from Middle Bronze Age settlements in mountainous Dagestan. In summary, it should be noted that domestic monuments of Dagestan have been studied variably. Among the settlements in the mountainous region, the Upper Gunib and Irganay No. I settlements stand out due to the scale of research. The materials from the Upper Gunib and Irganay No. I settlements are a valuable source for studying the local culture, but unfortunately, they require summarization and complete publication. To fully address the issues related to the study of settlements from the Middle Bronze Age, new explorations and large-scale excavations are necessary. The settlements in mountainous Dagestan remain relatively poorly studied, particularly in Southern Dagestan, which remains a blank spot on the archaeological map of Dagestan. There is a pressing need to conduct large-scale excavations of settlements from the Kayakent-Khorochoyev culture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Исторический журнал научные исследования
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0609.2025.6.76722
Primary Topic
Soil and Environmental Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The history of the study of settlements from the Middle Bronze Age in mountainous Dagestan

Gamzat Dibirovich Ataev, Abdulkadir Isaevich Omarov
Исторический журнал научные исследования
Soil and Environmental Studies
article

The history of the study of settlements from the Middle Bronze Age in mountainous Dagestan

Gamzat Dibirovich Ataev, Abdulkadir Isaevich Omarov
article en

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the history of the study of settlements of the Middle Bronze Age in mountainous Dagestan. Researching these settlements will shed light on issues of local specificity and the patterns of cultural-historical, socio-economic, and ethno-cultural development in areas with a high intensity of contact among various cultures. The article focuses on the historiography of the study of Middle Bronze Age settlements in the mountainous Republic of Dagestan, highlighting stages of research and summarizing the results. The first stage – pre-Soviet – from 1880 to 1917; the second stage – from 1918 to 1941; the third stage – from 1945 to 1951; the fourth stage – from 1951 to 1973; the fifth stage – from 1974 to 1991; the sixth stage – from 1992 to 2024. There are prerequisites for a detailed study of Bronze Age settlements in mountainous Dagestan. These are based on significant materials obtained and comparative data from other regions of Dagestan and the Caucasus. A large amount of material has been accumulated from settlements and cemeteries. An important circumstance is the presence of substantial research in the archaeology of Dagestan and the Caucasus, the data of which are analyzed in the article. The article analyzes perspectives on issues related to the study and interpretation of materials from Middle Bronze Age settlements in mountainous Dagestan. In summary, it should be noted that domestic monuments of Dagestan have been studied variably. Among the settlements in the mountainous region, the Upper Gunib and Irganay No. I settlements stand out due to the scale of research. The materials from the Upper Gunib and Irganay No. I settlements are a valuable source for studying the local culture, but unfortunately, they require summarization and complete publication. To fully address the issues related to the study of settlements from the Middle Bronze Age, new explorations and large-scale excavations are necessary. The settlements in mountainous Dagestan remain relatively poorly studied, particularly in Southern Dagestan, which remains a blank spot on the archaeological map of Dagestan. There is a pressing need to conduct large-scale excavations of settlements from the Kayakent-Khorochoyev culture.

Исторический журнал научные исследования(6)
Dubna State University (RU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Soil and Environmental Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.