PATHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PARAMETERS SHOW NO SIGNIFICANT ASSOCIATION WITH RESIDUAL CANCER BURDEN IN BREAST CARCINOMA

Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) is a validated scoring system that quantifies the amount of tumour remaining after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer, providing prognostic information beyond binary outcomes, such as pathologic complete response (pCR). pCR represents a binary endpoint within various NAC response-grading systems, including RCB, rather than a separate reporting system. This study aimed to assess clinicopathological and molecular predictors of RCB class, including histological grade, histopathological type, molecular subtype, and Ki-67 index. A retrospective study was conducted on 68 patients diagnosed with breast carcinoma who underwent NAC. Descriptive statistics and Pearson, Spearman, and chi-square tests were used to evaluate associations between these variables and RCB class. The mean Ki-67 index was 49.9% (standard deviation not specified), and most tumours were grade 2 (48.5%), invasive carcinoma of no special type (79.4%), and luminal B subtype (63.2%). The distribution of RCB classes was RCB III (42.6%), RCB II (35.3%), RCB 0 (13.2%), and RCB I (8.8%). Statistical analysis did not reveal significant associations between histological grade, histopathological type, molecular subtype, or Ki-67 and RCB class (all p > 0.05). No statistically significant associations were identified; however, the study may be insufficiently powered to detect smaller but clinically meaningful relationships. These findings point to the need for larger, multicentre studies with standardised biomarker assessment to improve post-treatment prognostication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Folia Medica Indonesiana
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65346/2599-056x.2407
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PATHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PARAMETERS SHOW NO SIGNIFICANT ASSOCIATION WITH RESIDUAL CANCER BURDEN IN BREAST CARCINOMA

Fishella Aprista Rahmanti, SANDHIKA Willy, Lusiani Tjandra
Folia Medica Indonesiana
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

PATHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PARAMETERS SHOW NO SIGNIFICANT ASSOCIATION WITH RESIDUAL CANCER BURDEN IN BREAST CARCINOMA

Fishella Aprista Rahmanti, SANDHIKA Willy, Lusiani Tjandra
article en

Abstract

Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) is a validated scoring system that quantifies the amount of tumour remaining after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer, providing prognostic information beyond binary outcomes, such as pathologic complete response (pCR). pCR represents a binary endpoint within various NAC response-grading systems, including RCB, rather than a separate reporting system. This study aimed to assess clinicopathological and molecular predictors of RCB class, including histological grade, histopathological type, molecular subtype, and Ki-67 index. A retrospective study was conducted on 68 patients diagnosed with breast carcinoma who underwent NAC. Descriptive statistics and Pearson, Spearman, and chi-square tests were used to evaluate associations between these variables and RCB class. The mean Ki-67 index was 49.9% (standard deviation not specified), and most tumours were grade 2 (48.5%), invasive carcinoma of no special type (79.4%), and luminal B subtype (63.2%). The distribution of RCB classes was RCB III (42.6%), RCB II (35.3%), RCB 0 (13.2%), and RCB I (8.8%). Statistical analysis did not reveal significant associations between histological grade, histopathological type, molecular subtype, or Ki-67 and RCB class (all p > 0.05). No statistically significant associations were identified; however, the study may be insufficiently powered to detect smaller but clinically meaningful relationships. These findings point to the need for larger, multicentre studies with standardised biomarker assessment to improve post-treatment prognostication.

Folia Medica IndonesianaVol. 61(2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.