Quadriceps versus hamstring and patellar tendon autografts for ACL reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: <br/>To compare quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts with hamstring tendon (HT) and bone patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. <br/><br/>Design: <br/>Systematic review and meta-analysis. <br/><br/>Methods: <br/>Databases were searched for RCTs comparing QT with HT, and BPTB autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Study selection followed the PRISMA guidelines, with methodological quality assessed via the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the GRADE for certainty of evidence. Outcomes included graft failure, donor site morbidity, complications, clinical measures, functional outcomes, and PROMs. Meta-analysis determined pooled effects on eligible outcomes. <br/><br/>Results: <br/>Twelve RCTs (636 patients) showed no differences in graft failure rates (RR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.04]; p = 0.83). QT demonstrated lower donor site morbidity compared to HT and BPTB autografts (RR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.24 to 1.70]; p &lt; 0.001). For strength outcomes, QT showed superior hamstring strength and hamstring: quadriceps ratio, while HT demonstrated greater quadriceps strength. Joint laxity and most PROMs were comparable between groups, with the exception of KOOS at 12 months, which favoured HT and BPTB autografts. <br/><br/>Conclusions: <br/>QT autografts demonstrate equivalent graft failure, laxity, and most PROMs compared to HT and BPTB autografts, while offering significantly lower donor site morbidity and better hamstring strength preservation in primary ACLR. <br/><br/>Key practice points: <br/>• All three autograft types (QT, HT, BPTB) yield comparable ACLR outcomes <br/>despite specific complications and strength differences. <br/>• Standardised reporting of graft failure and post-operative complications is <br/>needed in future research. <br/>• Patient-specific factors and rehabilitation goals should guide individualised graft selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)
Published
2025-10-24
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quadriceps versus hamstring and patellar tendon autografts for ACL reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ty White, Wayne Anthony Hing, Francois Tudor, Larissa Sattler et al.
Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Quadriceps versus hamstring and patellar tendon autografts for ACL reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ty White, Wayne Anthony Hing, Francois Tudor, Larissa Sattler, M. D. Castro, Lucas Antonio
article en

Abstract

Aim: <br/>To compare quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts with hamstring tendon (HT) and bone patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. <br/><br/>Design: <br/>Systematic review and meta-analysis. <br/><br/>Methods: <br/>Databases were searched for RCTs comparing QT with HT, and BPTB autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Study selection followed the PRISMA guidelines, with methodological quality assessed via the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the GRADE for certainty of evidence. Outcomes included graft failure, donor site morbidity, complications, clinical measures, functional outcomes, and PROMs. Meta-analysis determined pooled effects on eligible outcomes. <br/><br/>Results: <br/>Twelve RCTs (636 patients) showed no differences in graft failure rates (RR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.04]; p = 0.83). QT demonstrated lower donor site morbidity compared to HT and BPTB autografts (RR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.24 to 1.70]; p &lt; 0.001). For strength outcomes, QT showed superior hamstring strength and hamstring: quadriceps ratio, while HT demonstrated greater quadriceps strength. Joint laxity and most PROMs were comparable between groups, with the exception of KOOS at 12 months, which favoured HT and BPTB autografts. <br/><br/>Conclusions: <br/>QT autografts demonstrate equivalent graft failure, laxity, and most PROMs compared to HT and BPTB autografts, while offering significantly lower donor site morbidity and better hamstring strength preservation in primary ACLR. <br/><br/>Key practice points: <br/>• All three autograft types (QT, HT, BPTB) yield comparable ACLR outcomes <br/>despite specific complications and strength differences. <br/>• Standardised reporting of graft failure and post-operative complications is <br/>needed in future research. <br/>• Patient-specific factors and rehabilitation goals should guide individualised graft selection.

Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)
Bond University (AU), Gold Coast Hospital (AU), OR Concepts Applied (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.